Simarra Clarke v Urban Legends (Young) Pty Ltd

Case

[2020] FWC 1248

3 APRIL 2020

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2020] FWC 1248
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Simarra Clarke
v
Urban Legends (Young) Pty Ltd
(U2020/475)

VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI

SYDNEY, 3 APRIL 2020

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy.

[1] Simarra Clarke was employed by Urban Legends (Young) Pty Ltd from 16 September 2019 until she was dismissed on 25 December 2019.

[2] On 14 January 2020, Simarra Clarke made an application for a remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[3] On 16 March 2020, Urban Legends (Young) Pty Ltd filed an Employers Response (form F3) raising a jurisdictional objection on the basis that Simarra Clarke did not serve the minimum employment period.

[4] The matter was referred to me to determine the jurisdictional objection. Correspondence was sent to Simarra Clarke on 19 March 2020 requiring her to provide a statement to support her claim that she had served the minimum employment period. She was asked to provide the information by no later than 4.00pm on 26 March 2020. No response was received from Simarra Clarke.

[5] On 27 March 2020, further correspondence was sent to Simarra Clarke directing her to provide a response by 4.00pm on 1 April 2020. She was advised that in the absence of a reply her application may be dismissed.

[6] To date, Simarra Clarke has not responded to any of the Commission’s correspondence.

[7] Section 587 of the Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

(2) Despite paragraphs (1)(b) and (c), FWC must not dismiss an application under section 365 or 773 on the ground that the application:

(a) is frivolous or vexatious; or

(b) has no reasonable prospects of success.

(3) FWC may dismiss an application:

(a) on its own initiative; or

(b) on application.

[8] The words, “Without limiting when FWC may dismiss an application” at the commencement of s.587(1) of the Act, establish that the jurisdiction of the Commission to dismiss an application is not limited to the circumstances set out in s.587(1)(a), (b) and (c).

[9] In the circumstances I have decided to dismiss the application for want of prosecution pursuant to s.587(3)(a) of the Act.

[10] An order to that effect will issue with this decision.

VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR717322>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0