SIGALLA
v
The QUEEN
[2022] HCASL 166
S73/2022
The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
An extension of time is necessary to enable this application to proceed. As to the first proposed ground of appeal, the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal is plainly correct. The second proposed ground of appeal is an unsuitable vehicle for the grant of special leave. Accordingly, special leave should be refused. That being so, it would be futile to grant the required extension of time.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
P.A. Keane J.S. Gleeson 19 September 2022
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Sigalla v The Queen and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] HCASL 166
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The High Court examined the first proposed ground of appeal, which concerned the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal. The Court concluded that the decision was plainly correct and therefore did not warrant any further appeal. The second proposed ground of appeal was also reviewed, and the Court found it to be an unsuitable vehicle for the grant of special leave. Consequently, the High Court deemed it appropriate to refuse special leave and deemed it futile to grant the required extension of time.
Following the High Court's examination and decision on the matter, it directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. The order was made on 19 September 2022, and the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed. This decision was based on the Court's findings that the decision made by the Court of Criminal Appeal was correct and that the second proposed ground of appeal was unsuitable for the grant of special leave.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.