Sidhu (Migration) - [2025] ARTA 1743

Sidhu (Migration) [2025] ARTA 1743 (25 August 2025)
DECISION AND
REASONS FOR DECISION
Applicant:Mr Gurpreet Singh Sidhu
Respondent:  Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
Tribunal Number:  2407652

Tribunal:General Member S Waring
Place:Brisbane
Date: 25 August 2025
Decision:The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration in accordance with the order that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:
·cl 500.212 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

Statement made on 25 August 2025 at 10:14am
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – genuine student – new study field – employment prospects – close family ties in home country – considerable financial resources – complying with visa conditions – value of Australian courses – business plan – improve family business – no break in studies – decision under review remitted
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 65, 359, 499
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cls 500.212, 500.611
STATEMENT OF REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 21 March 2024 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act). The applicant applied to the Tribunal for review on 9 April 2024 and attached the decision of the Department.
At the time the applicant applied for the visa, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.
The applicant is now 33 years-of-age. His home address is in Dewas Naka, Madhya Pradesh, India.
On 9 April 2024 Mr Sidhu applied for a Tribunal review of the delegate’s decision. He was assisted in the review process by Mr Sharma who also attended the hearing on 21 July 2025. An interpreter in the English and Punjabi languages provided assistance at the hearing. A number of documents were provided to the Administrative Review Tribunal (the Tribunal), for consideration, prior to the hearing. These are enumerated and discussed below.
Student visa application
On 29 June 2023 the applicant made his first trip to Australia on a subclass 408 (entertainment) visa. He has not departed the country since then – having been granted a subclass 010 bridging visa on 27 September 2023.
The applicant lodged a student visa application on 27 September 2023 together with Confirmation of Enrolment (CoE) documents to undertake the following:
●EB946D67 Diploma of Automotive Management
● EB946384 Certificate IV in Automotive Mechanical Diagnosis
● EB944954 Certificate III in Heavy Commercial Vehicle Mechanical Technology.
The CoE documents disclose the Certificate III course ran from 8 October 2023 to 7 April 2024 to be followed by the Certificate IV course (from 21 October 2024 to 21 April 2025). The Diploma course commenced on 5 May 2025 and has an expected completion date of 12 January 2026.
Mr Sidhu attached a ‘genuine temporary entrant statement’ (the original statement) to his student visa application claiming that he decided to study heavy vehicle maintenance and repair because his career ambitions lie in the automotive industry which is thriving in his home country. He indicated that he chose Training Australia First as his education provider because it focusses on problem-solving in vehicles and because the course content is relevant to a future path or him to operate an automotive business effectively. He described the courses he is studying (and the Diploma course he intended to study) in detail.
The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl 500.212 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations) on the basis that he is not a genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student. The delegate was concerned that, as the applicant arrived in Australia (on a 408-entertainment visa) as a guitar player, he intends to study in a field unrelated to his previous studies or employment.
Evidence before the Tribunal
On 8 April 2025 the Tribunal wrote to the applicant, via his representative, a s 359(2) letter, which stated as follows:
As the applicant applied for the visa based on undertaking a course of study in Australia, it is a requirement of the visa for the applicant to be:
· enrolled in a registered course of study; and
· a genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student.
The applicant will need to provide sufficient information to satisfy us that they meet both of these visa requirements.
Request to provide information
The applicant is now invited to give, in writing, all relevant information about the course(s) of study they are undertaking and their entry and stay in Australia as a student. Details of the information requested are set out in the Student Visa Information Form (the information form).
The Tribunal also advised that in considering whether an applicant is a genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student, the Tribunal must have regard to Ministerial Direction No.108 ‘Assessing the genuine temporary entrant criterion for Student visa and Student Guardian visa applications’. A link to the Direction was provided.
On 14 July 2025 the applicant submitted the requested information form to the Tribunal together with a Statement of Purpose which elaborated on his original statement as follows:
·he wants to become an Automotive Diagnostic Specialist
·his career prospects will be increased post-study due to the high demand (in India and internationally) for skilled vehicle diagnostic professionals, especially as modern vehicles increasingly rely on advanced electronic systems requiring specialized technical expertise
·his chosen courses are relevant to his circumstances because he loves automobiles and has a passion for unravelling complex vehicle issues. He has a knack for problem-solving
·the institute he has chosen offers hands-on training, experienced faculty and state-of-the-art facilities
·he has a family in India including his parents, wife and son. He maintains contact by calling them every day
·his family has considerable financial resources which comfortably cover all his expenses in Australia
·he understands that the temporary visa (subclass 500) has certain conditions to abide by and is committed to following each of them.
On 14 July 2025 the applicant submitted a further statement (the pre-hearing submission) explaining that he selected a training provider in Australia because:
·in India, most automotive training is theoretical and lacks access to modern diagnostic tools and technologies
·compared to countries like Canada or the UK, Australia offers a more cost-effective and career-focused educational path due to the opportunity to gain local work experience while studying. This, he says, allows for learning in real-time.
Attached to the pre-hearing submission the applicant provided supporting documents including a business plan for ‘DRIVEZ Auto Repair Services’ (prepared for the purposes of the Tribunal’s review) which outlines how he intends to put his new skills to work when he returns to India.
In relation to the connection between his past experience and his current studies the applicant stated in the pre-hearing submission that his past employment as a service planner (and also at Isher Goods Carriers where he was responsible for organizing maintenance schedules, coordinating vehicle services, and ensuring fleet readiness) included roles that directly align with the management aspects of his Australian studies. Addressing the delegate’s concern (above), the applicant stated that he only briefly worked as a musician/guitar player in July 2023.
In relation to the connection between his current studies and his future business aspirations, the applicant stated in the pre-hearing submission that:
·his long-term plan is to establish a modern, organized automotive service centre in India under the business name DRIVEZ Auto Repair Services
·his career plan includes bringing advanced automotive knowledge back to his home country to improve workshop standards there.
Mr Sidhu has provided evidence to the Tribunal, from the education provider, that he has successfully completed the Certificate III and Certificate IV courses.
The Tribunal also has before it records from the Provider Registration and International Student Management System (PRISMS) relating to the applicant’s enrolment/s, and his movement records which set out his immigration history in Australia.
The hearing
At the commencement of proceedings on 21 July 2025, the Tribunal noted that the issue before it is whether the applicant meets the genuine temporary entrant criterion in ‘the regulations’ per cl 500.212. The requirements (set out in the Tribunal’s letter of 8 April 2025) and Direction No.108 (the Direction) were raised.
Mr Sidhu answered questions addressed to him by the Tribunal consistently with the information above and in detail. The applicant elaborated on the statements and submissions set out above – stating that:
·he is currently gaining the ‘hands-on’ training he was seeking by attending workshops on Mondays and Tuesdays (5pm to 9pm), Thursdays and Fridays (9am to 5pm)
·in India he worked in his family’s business which operated a fleet of 9 -10 haulage trucks. He owned 3 of the trucks - his father and uncle owned the remaining trucks. His brother worked in the business performing despatching and payroll duties
·his family built up the fleet operations by developing land (approximately 3 acres) to accommodate a workshop and depot - including a 2 acre yard to park the trucks
·as part of the family business, he would drive one of his trucks and hire the other 2 out. He was driving 4 to 5 days a week and hired mechanics to perform maintenance on his trucks (oil change and servicing)
·recently, he (and other drivers in his home town) acquired new generation ‘euro trucks’ (2019-20 BS4 vehicles) which presented with problems in their ignition due to complexities with their 37 starting sensors. This was problematic for his family business because here would be 2 or 3 days of ‘down time’ when a problem arose. The mechanics called in to fix the problems (requiring computerised diagnostics) were not trained to fix new generation ‘euro trucks’
·while he did not come to Australia with the specific intention of studying, he decided (after arriving) to learn how to maintain and repair the new generation ‘euro trucks’ to improve the efficiency problems of his family business and also to train others in his home town. When visiting various automotive workshops he saw that in Australia, these trucks are fixed quickly and he wanted to learn how that can be achieved
·when he returns to India he intends to take over the scheduling, payroll and workshop duties currently being performed in the family business by his brother and uncle
·his family has significant assets and he intends to return to India to resume his role in the family business, improve profitability and to reunite with his wife and child.
The applicant’s parents (though currently visiting Australia for a short time) reside in India. His parents will return to India within 10 days, once the festival they are participating in is over. Mr Sidhu’s parents (aged 45 and 46) have their own parents in India to care for.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
The criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are set out in Part 500 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations (the regulation). The primary criteria in cl 500.211 to cl 500.218 must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria. The issue in the present case is whether the applicant meets cl 500.212.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and remits the visa application for reconsideration.
Genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student (cl 500.212)
Clause 500.212 requires as follows:
The applicant is a genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student because:
(a)the applicant intends genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily, having regard to:
(i)the applicant’s circumstances; and
(ii)the applicant’s immigration history; and
(iii)if the applicant is a minor—the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the applicant; and
(iv)any other relevant matter; and
(b)the applicant intends to comply with any conditions subject to which the visa is granted, having regard to:
(i)the applicant’s record of compliance with any condition of a visa previously held by the applicant (if any); and
(ii)the applicant’s stated intention to comply with any conditions to which the visa may be subject; and
(c)of any other relevant matter.
Does the applicant intend genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily?
In considering whether the applicant satisfies cl 500.212(a), the Tribunal must have regard to the Direction, ‘Assessing the genuine temporary entrant criterion for Student visa and Student Guardian visa applications’, made under s 499 of the Migration Act (the Act). The Direction, which is attached to this decision, requires the Tribunal to have regard to a number of specified factors in relation to:
·    the applicant’s circumstances in their home country, potential circumstances in Australia, and the value of the course to the applicant’s future;
·    the applicant’s immigration history, including previous applications for an Australian visa or for visas to other countries, and previous travel to Australia or other countries;
·    if the applicant is a minor, the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the applicant; and
·    any other relevant information provided by the applicant, or information otherwise available to the decision maker, including information that may be either beneficial or unfavourable to the applicant.
The Direction indicates that the factors specified should not be used as a checklist but rather, are intended only to guide decision makers when considering the applicant’s circumstances as a whole, in reaching a finding about whether the applicant satisfies the genuine temporary entrant criterion.
The applicant completed high schooling in India in 2010.
As stated above, the applicant applied for this student visa to study a Certificate III in Heavy Commercial Vehicle Mechanical Technology to be followed by a Certificate IV in Automotive Mechanical Diagnosis and a Diploma of Automotive Management. These qualifications are at a higher level than his existing educational qualifications.
That the applicant is now undertaking study at a higher level than his previous education, some 15 years since he last studied, and in circumstances where he has worked in the haulage business (and as an owner of trucks requiring ongoing repair/maintenance) indicates to the Tribunal that his motivations for undertaking study in Australia are related to genuine academic achievement and career advancement.
The Tribunal holds some concerns about the extent to which the applicant has considered and evaluated his idea of opening an Auto Repair Services business, particularly given his evidence that he prepared the Business Plan document for the purposes of this review and has not used it for any business-related purpose such as applying for finance. Nevertheless, the Tribunal accepts from Mr Sidhu’s oral evidence that his plans to extend the operations of his family’s business are genuine. The Tribunal accepts that the applicant’s current study aligns with and is relevant to this plan.
At hearing the Tribunal found the applicant to be a reliable and forthcoming witness. He was able to provide detailed and thoughtful evidence about his courses of study, his reasons for studying in Australia, and his plans for the future and his personal motivations.
The applicant‘s consistent and detailed evidence as to his reasons for choosing to study in Australia is accepted. The Tribunal notes that Mr Sidhu has family ties in India, including his birth family, grandparents, wife and child. He owns a small fleet of haulage vehicles in India and continues (and will continue) to earn an income by hiring them to drivers. The Tribunal considers that these factors are indicative of a person who is only a temporary entrant and wishes to return to their country.
Evidence before the Tribunal, including from PRISMS, indicates the applicant is enrolled in and studying the courses he applied for the visa to study. He has had no changes to his enrolments, no enrolments cancelled, and no breaks in his studies. He has completed the Certificate III and IV courses and is now studying the Diploma.
Based on the information before the Tribunal it is accepted that the applicant will complete the Diploma in January 2026 as planned. The Tribunal is satisfied that Mr Sidhu has been studying since his courses commenced in October 2023, including while as the holder of a bridging visa. The Tribunal considers that these matters are strong evidence that he is in Australia for the purposes of study as he claims and is not using the student visa program to maintain residence in Australia for a purpose unrelated to study. The Tribunal weighs this strongly in his favour.
As to the applicant’s circumstances in his home country, no evidence has been presented that the applicant’s economic circumstances would present as a significant incentive for the applicant not to return to India. There is no evidence before the Tribunal that political and civil unrest would result in the applicant choosing to remain in Australia indefinitely. There is no evidence before the Tribunal of military commitments that would present as a significant motive for him not to return.
On the basis of the above, the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant intends genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily. Accordingly, the applicant meets cl 500.212(a).
For the following reasons, the Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and remits the visa application for reconsideration.
Does the applicant intend to comply with visa conditions?
For the applicant to meet cl 500.212(b), the Tribunal must be satisfied that the applicant intends to comply with any conditions subject to which the visa is granted, having regard to the applicant’s record of compliance with any condition of any visa they previously held, and the applicant’s stated intention to comply with any conditions to which the visa may be subject.
A visa granted to an applicant who meets the primary criteria must have the following conditions imposed (cl 500.611(1)): 8105 (work limitation), 8202 (enrolment/course progress/course attendance), 8501 (health insurance), 8516 (continue to satisfy criteria), 8517 (dependents’ education), 8532 (arrangements for under 18s) and 8533 (notify address/education provider) and 8208 (no critical technology related study without approval).
At the hearing the Tribunal discussed conditions applying to his student visa with the applicant. He was aware of these conditions, giving evidence of his understanding of the work limitation that applies, and the requirements that he engage in his study. Mr Sidhu expressly stated that he would comply with the conditions attached to his student visa. The evidence before the Tribunal is that the applicant has abided by conditions of the visa issued to him on 9 June 2023.
On the basis of the above, the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant intends to comply with the conditions subject to which the visa is granted as required by cl 500.212(b).
Is the applicant a genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student because of any other relevant matter?

For the applicant to meet cl 500.212(c), the Tribunal must be satisfied that the applicant is a genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student because of any other relevant matter (in addition to the requirements in cl 500.212(a) and (b)). There is no other relevant matter to consider. The Tribunal finds the applicant meets cl 500.212(c).
Accordingly, the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant is a genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student as required by cl 500.212.
Given the above findings, the appropriate course is to remit the application for the visa to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa.
DECISION
The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, in accordance with the order that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:
·cl 500.212 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Date of hearing(s):21 July 2025
Representative for the Applicant: Mr Ashutosh Sharma (MARN: 1682588)
Attachment – Direction No 108
DIRECTION NUMBER 108 – ASSESSING THE GENUINE TEMPORARY ENTRANT CRITERION FOR STUDENT VISA AND STUDENT GUARDIAN VISA APPLICATIONS
(Section 499)
I, CLARE O’NEIL, Minister for Home Affairs and Minister for Cyber Security give this Direction under section 499 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
Dated:
Clare O’Neil
Minister for Home Affairs and Minister for Cyber Security

Note: Section 499(1) of the Act empowers the Minister to give a written direction to a person or body having functions or powers under the Act if the directions are about the performance of those functions; or the exercise of those powers. Under section 499(2) of the Act, the direction must not be inconsistent with the Act or the Migration Regulations 1994. Under section 499(2A) of the Act, the person or body must comply with the Direction.
Part 1 - Preliminary
Name of Direction
This Direction is Direction No. 108 – Assessing the genuine temporary entrant criterion for Student visa and Student Guardian visa applications.
It may be cited as Direction No. 108.
Commencement
This Direction commences on 23 March 2024.
Revocation
Direction No. 69, given under section 499 of the Act, is revoked.
Interpretation
Act means the Migration Act 1958.
Finally determined has the same meaning as is set out in subsections 5(9) and (9A) of the Act.
Genuine temporary entrant means a person who satisfies the genuine temporary entrant criterion for Student visa or Student Guardian visa applications.
Genuine temporary entrant criterion refers to clause 500.212(a), 500.312(a) and 590.215(a) at Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Home country has the same meaning as the definition of that term in regulation 1.03 in Part 1 of the Regulations.
Regulations mean the Migration Regulations 1994.
Relative has the same meaning as the definition of that term in regulation 1.03 in Part 1 of the Regulations.
Spouse has the same meaning as the definition of the term in section 5F of the Act.
Student visa means a Subclass 500 (Student) visa
Student Guardian visa means a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.
Application
This Direction applies to delegates performing functions or exercising powers under section 65 of the Act in relation to assessing an applicant against the genuine temporary entrant criterion for Student visa applications and Student Guardian visa applications (as applicable).
This Direction also applies to members of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; or the Administrative Review Tribunal, upon its establishment; who review the decisions of primary decision-makers in relation to a Student visa or Student Guardian visa application.
This Direction applies in relation to Student visa applications and Student Guardian visa applications made before 23 March 2024 but not finally determined on that date, including such visa applications that are remitted from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; or the Administrative Review Tribunal, upon its establishment; or a Court.
The genuine temporary entrant criterion must be satisfied by all applicants who make an application for a Student visa and seek to satisfy the primary or secondary criteria, or an application for a Student Guardian visa and seek to satisfy the primary criteria.
Note: Direction No. 106 applies in relation to Subclass 500 (Student) visa applications and Student Guardian visa applications made on or after 23 March 2024, including visa applications made on or after that date that are remitted from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; or the Administrative Review Tribunal, upon its establishment; or a Court.
Preamble
The Australian Government operates a student visa program that enables people who are not Australian citizens or Australian permanent residents to undertake study in Australia. A person who wants to undertake a course of study under the student visa program must obtain a student visa before they can commence a course of study in Australia. A successful applicant must be both a genuine temporary entrant and a genuine student.
An applicant who is a genuine temporary entrant will have circumstances that support a genuine intention to temporarily enter and remain in Australia, notwithstanding the potential for this intention to change over time to an intention to utilise lawful means to remain in Australia for an extended period of time or permanently.
The genuine temporary entrant criterion for Student visa applications requires the Minister to be satisfied that the applicant intends genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily, having regard to:
a) the applicant’s circumstances; and
b)the applicant’s immigration history; and
c)if the applicant is a minor — the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the applicant; and
d)any other relevant matter
This Direction provides guidance to decision makers on what factors require consideration when assessing the above paragraphs a) to d), to determine whether the applicant genuinely intends to stay in Australia temporarily.
Decision makers must take a reasonable and balanced approach between the need to make a timely decision on a Student visa or Student Guardian visa application and the need to identify those applicants who, at time of decision, do not genuinely intend to stay in Australia temporarily.
Part 2 – Directions
Assessing the genuine temporary entrant criterion
1.Decision makers should not use the factors specified in this Direction as a checklist. The listed factors are intended only to guide decision makers when considering the applicant’s circumstances as a whole, in reaching a finding about whether the applicant satisfies the genuine temporary entrant criterion.
2.Decision makers should assess whether, on balance, the genuine temporary entrant criterion is satisfied, by:
a)considering the applicant against all factors specified in this Direction; and
b)considering any other relevant information provided by the applicant (or information otherwise available to the decision maker)
3.Decision makers may request additional information and/or further evidence from the applicant to demonstrate that they are a genuine temporary entrant, where closer scrutiny of the applicant's circumstances is considered appropriate.
4.Circumstances where further scrutiny may be appropriate include but are not limited to:
a)information in statistical, intelligence and analysis reports on migration fraud and immigration compliance compiled by the department indicates the need for further scrutiny;
b)the applicant or a relative of the applicant has an immigration history of reasonable concern;
c)the applicant intends to study in a field unrelated to their previous studies or employment; and
d)apparent inconsistencies in information provided by the applicant in their Student visa application or Student Guardian visa application.
5.An application for a Student visa or a Student Guardian visa should be refused if, after weighing up the applicant’s circumstances, immigration history and any other relevant matter, the decision maker is not satisfied that the applicant genuinely intends a temporary stay in Australia.
The applicant’s circumstances
6.Decision makers should have regard to the applicant’s circumstances in their home country and the applicant’s potential circumstances in Australia.
7.For primary applicants of Student visas, decision makers should have regard to the value of the course to the applicant’s future.
8.Weight should be placed on an applicant’s circumstances that indicate that the Student visa or Student Guardian visa is intended primarily for maintaining residence in Australia.
The applicant’s circumstances in their home country
9.When considering the applicant’s circumstances in their home country, decision makers should have regard to the following factors:
a)whether the applicant has reasonable reasons for not undertaking the study in their home country or region if a similar course is already available there. Decision makers should allow for any reasonable motives established by the applicant;
b)the extent of the applicant’s personal ties to their home country (for example family, community and employment) and whether those circumstances would serve as a significant incentive to return to their home country;
c)economic circumstances of the applicant that would present as a significant incentive for the applicant not to return to their home country. These circumstances may include consideration of the applicant’s circumstances relative to the home country and to Australia;
d)military service commitments that would present as a significant incentive for the applicant not to return to their home country; and
e)political and civil unrest in the applicant’s home country. This includes situations of a nature that may induce the applicant to apply for a Student visa or Student Guardian visa as means of obtaining entry to Australia for the purpose of remaining indefinitely. Decision makers should be aware of the changing circumstances in the applicant’s home country and the influence these may have on an applicant’s motivations for applying for a Student visa or a Student Guardian visa.
10.Decision makers may have regard to the applicant’s circumstances in their home country relative to the circumstances of others in that country.
The applicant’s potential circumstances in Australia
11.In considering the applicant’s potential circumstances in Australia, decision makers should have regard to the following factors:
a)The applicant’s ties with Australia which would present as a strong incentive to remain in Australia. This may include family and community ties;
b)evidence that the student visa programme is being used to circumvent the intentions of the migration programme;
c)whether the Student visa or Student Guardian visa is being used to maintain ongoing residence;
d)whether the primary and secondary applicant(s) have entered into a relationship of concern for a successful Student visa outcome. Where a decision maker determines that an applicant and dependant have contrived their relationship for a successful Student visa outcomes, the decision maker may find that both applicants do not satisfy the genuine temporary entrant criterion; and
e)the applicant’s knowledge of living in Australia and their intended course of study and the associated education provider; including previous study and qualifications, what is a realistic level of knowledge an applicant is expected to know and the level of research the applicant has undertaken into their proposed course of study and living arrangements.
Value of the course to the applicant’s future
12.Decision makers should have regard to the following factors when considering the value of the course to the applicant’s future:
a)whether the student is seeking to undertake a course that is consistent with their current level of education and whether the course will assist the applicant to obtain employment or improve employment prospects in their home country. Decision makers should allow for reasonable changes to career or study pathways; and
b)relevance of the course to the student’s past or proposed future employment either in their home country or a third country; and
c)remuneration the applicant could expect to receive in the home country or a third country, compared with Australia, using the qualifications to be gained from the proposed course of study.
The applicant's immigration history
13.An applicant’s immigration history refers both to their visa and travel history.
14.When considering the applicant’s immigration history, decision makers should have regard to the following factors:
a)Previous visa applications for Australia or other countries, including:
i.if the applicant previously applied for an Australian temporary or permanent visa, whether those visa applications are yet to be finally determined (within the meaning of subsection 5(9) of the Act), were granted, or grounds on which the application(s) were refused; and
ii.if the applicant has previously applied for visa(s) to other countries, whether the applicant was refused a visa and the circumstances that led to visa refusal.
iii.b. Previous travels to Australia or other countries, including:
iv.if the applicant previously travelled to Australia, whether they complied with the conditions of their visa and left before their visa ceased, and if not, were there circumstances beyond their control;
v.whether the applicant previously held a visa that was cancelled or considered for cancellation, and the associated circumstances;
vi.the amount of time the applicant has spent in Australia and whether the Student visa or Student Guardian visa may be used primarily for maintaining ongoing residence, including whether the applicant has undertaken a series of short, inexpensive courses, or has been onshore for some time without successfully completing a qualification; and
vii.if the applicant has travelled to countries other than Australia, whether they complied with the migration laws of that country and the circumstances around any non-compliance.
If the applicant is a minor — the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the applicant
15.If the primary or secondary applicant for a Student visa is a minor, decision makers should have regard to the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the applicant.
Any other relevant matters
16.Decision makers should also have regard to any other relevant information provided by the applicant (or information otherwise available to the decision maker) when assessing the applicant’s intention to temporarily stay in Australia. This includes information that may be either beneficial or unfavourable to the applicant.