Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Shuguang Wang v Valuer General [2021] NSWLEC 74 Hearing dates: 6-7 July 2021 Date of orders: 8 July 2021 Decision date: 08 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Pain J Decision: (1) Appeal No 21/2437 is dismissed.
(2) The land value of 62 Farnsworth Avenue Campbelltown for the 2019 valuation year is confirmed as $394,000.
(3) The exhibits are returned.
Catchwords: VALUATION OF LAND – appeal against land valuation for 1 July 2019 year under s 6A(1) Valuation of Land Act 1916 – comparable sales approach of Valuer-General’s expert valuer correct – land valuations in earlier years irrelevant – comparison of sales of improved properties in real estate market with land values irrelevant – applicant’s novel approach not accepted – appeal dismissed
Legislation Cited: Valuation of Land Act 1916 (NSW) ss 6A, 29, 34, 37, 40
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 31.23, 35.2
Cases Cited: Peter Sleiman Property Investments Pty Ltd v Valuer-General of NSW (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 47
Capuano v Roads and Maritime Services [2018] NSWLEC 59
Barratt v Valuer General [2015] NSWLEC 1141
McCathie v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1944) 69 CLR 1
Gray v Valuer-General [2005] NSWLEC 513
Graham Trilby Pty Limited v Valuer-General [2008] NSWLEC 217
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shuguang Wang (Applicant)
Valuer General (Respondent)Representation: COUNSEL:
SOLICITORS:
S Wang in person (Applicant)
L Johnston (Respondent)
N/A (Applicant)
Crown Solicitor’s Office (Respondent)
File Number(s): 21/2437
Judgment
-
The Applicant Mr Shuguang Wang has commenced an appeal under s 37 of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 (NSW) (VL Act) against the determination of land value for the 1 July 2019 year for 62 Farnsworth Avenue Campbelltown by the Valuer-General (VG). The land value issued was $394,000. Mr Wang contends that the land value should be $236,137 or $337,000 or $350,000. Mr Wang represented himself.
Valuer-General’s statement of facts
-
The basic matters of fact concerning Mr Wang’s property are identified in the VG’s statement of facts. I do not understand any of these are disputed.
SITE AREA: 720.8m2
ZONING: R2 – Low Density Residential
PLANNING INSTRUMENT: Campbelltown Local Environmental Plan 2015
BASIS OF VALUATION: The land is to be valued having regard to section 6A(1) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 (NSW) (“the Act”) and the assumptions in s. 6A(1) of the Act.
This section of the Act assumes the land to be vacant and the building improvements are notionally removed. Although the improvements are notionally removed, the permitted use of the land must be taken into account in determining the “highest and best use”.
It is considered that the highest and best use for the land is the existing residential use.
SUBJECT SITE: The subject property is zoned ‘R2 - Low Density Residential’ under Campbelltown Local Environmental Plan 2015.
It is considered that the highest and best use for the land is the existing residential use. This use is a permitted use under the Campbelltown Local Environmental Plan 2015. The following…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Shuguang Wang v Valuer General and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] NSWLEC 74
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Valuer General's assessment of the land value was correct and whether the valuation process adhered to the statutory requirements under the Valuation of Land Act 1916. Wang argued that the Valuer General failed to properly consider market evidence and had applied an incorrect methodology. The court needed to determine whether the Valuer General's decision was reasonable and supported by the evidence.
The court examined the evidence and the Valuer General's methodology in detail. It concluded that the Valuer General's assessment was based on a thorough and systematic approach, consistent with legislative requirements. The court found that the Valuer General had appropriately considered relevant market evidence and applied the correct methodology in determining the land value. As a result, the court dismissed Wang's appeal and confirmed the land value of $394,000 for the 2019 valuation year.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Appeal No 21/2437 is dismissed.
(2) The land value of 62 Farnsworth Avenue Campbelltown for the 2019 valuation year is confirmed as $394,000.
(3) The exhibits are returned.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.