FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Short v Ambulance Victoria [2014] FCA 3
Citation: Short v Ambulance Victoria [2014] FCA 3 Parties: DARREN SHORT v AMBULANCE VICTORIA (ABN 50 373 327 705) File number: VID 1227 of 2011 Judge: MARSHALL ACJ Date of judgment: 15 January 2014 Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – adverse action – exercise of workplace right – making of complaint or inquiry in relation to employment – discrimination – mental disability – whether the withdrawal of an offer of interview for a higher duties position constitutes “adverse action” – whether adverse action taken for a prohibited reason – respondent’s onus of proof discharged.
INDUSTRIAL LAW – whether breach of an enterprise agreement – failure to refer disciplinary dispute to Fair Work Commission.
CONTRACT – whether conduct of respondent breached implied term of mutual trust and confidence in contract of employment – content of duty.
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 50, 340, 341, 342, 351, 360, 361
Public Administration Act 2004 (Vic)Cases cited: Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 1
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2013) 214 FCR 450Dates of hearing: 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 October 2013 Date of last submissions: 13 December 2013 Place: Melbourne Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 91 Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Wheelahan with Ms E Tueno Solicitor for the Applicant: Ms K Moorhouse-Perks Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Moore Solicitor for the Respondent: Lander & Rogers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
FAIR WORK DIVISION
VID 1227 of 2011
BETWEEN: DARREN SHORT
ApplicantAND: AMBULANCE VICTORIA (ABN 50 373 327 705)
Respondent
JUDGE:
MARSHALL ACJ
DATE OF ORDER:
15 JANUARY 2014
WHERE MADE:
MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The application is dismissed.
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
FAIR WORK DIVISION
VID 1227 of 2011
BETWEEN: DARREN SHORT
ApplicantAND: AMBULANCE VICTORIA (ABN 50 373 327 705)
Respondent
JUDGE:
MARSHALL ACJ
DATE:
15 JANUARY 2014
PLACE:
MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
On 14 July 2011 the respondent, Ambulance Victoria, terminated the employment of the applicant, Mr Short. At that time, Mr Short was employed as a qualified ambulance paramedic at the Lakes Entrance branch of Ambulance Victoria. Mr Short contends that, in terminating his employment, Ambulance Victoria contravened s 340(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (“the Act”) by taking adverse action against him because he “vigorously” exercised his workplace rights by making inquiries and/or complaints in relation to his employment. Mr Short also submits that Ambulance Victoria breached s 340(1) of the Act by taking adverse action against him by the following conduct:
·its refusal to allow him to perform higher duties on 8 July 2010;
·its issuing of a formal warning to him on 9 November 2010; and
·its standing down of him on 20 February 2011.
Mr…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Short v Ambulance Victoria and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] FCA 3
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the decision to terminate Mr Short was based solely on his unprovoked and unreasonable personal attack on Mr Standfield, a matter for which he had previously been warned regarding his conduct towards staff in supervisory or managerial roles. The court accepted the testimony of those involved in the decision-making process that this incident was the sole reason for the termination. Counsel for Mr Short's argument that his workplace rights played a part in the decision was rejected by the court, as it found no evidence to support this claim.
In conclusion, the court dismissed Mr Short's application, finding that none of his claims were substantiated. The court upheld the decision of Ambulance Victoria to terminate Mr Short's employment, ruling that it was based on legitimate grounds unrelated to his workplace rights. The court's decision effectively puts an end to Mr Short's legal challenge against his dismissal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.