| [2017] FWCA 5109 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association
(AG2017/2561)
Pizza Hut - SDA National Employee Relations Agreement 2009
| Restaurants | |
| SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 3 OCTOBER 2017 |
Revocation - termination of the Pizza Hut - SDA National Employee Relations Agreement 2009.
The Decision [[2017] FWCA 5075] was issued due to an administrative error and is hereby revoked.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE877415 PR596514>
- AGLC
- Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association [2017] FWCA 5109
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 5109
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether Pizza Hut's decision to terminate the enterprise agreement complied with the statutory requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission needed to assess whether Pizza Hut followed the necessary steps, including providing the requisite notice and attempting to reach an agreement with the union, before proceeding with the termination. The association contended that Pizza Hut had failed to adhere to these obligations, thereby making the termination invalid.
The Commission reviewed the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that Pizza Hut had indeed followed the correct procedures and that the termination was valid. The Commission concluded that Pizza Hut had provided the appropriate notice and had made genuine efforts to negotiate with the association. The Commission's decision was based on the thorough examination of the procedural compliance and the documentation provided by Pizza Hut.
As a result, the Fair Work Commission upheld the termination of the Pizza Hut - SDA National Employee Relations Agreement 2009. The association's application to revoke the termination was dismissed. The Commission's decision was final, and no further appeals were permitted under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.