Shop, Distribute and Allied Employees’ Association

Case

[2013] FWCA 2276

15 APRIL 2013

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2013] FWCA 2276

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Shop, Distribute and Allied Employees’ Association
(AG2013/5848)

QUEENS SUPERMARKET (WA) AND SDA AGREEMENT 2013

Retail industry

COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS

PERTH, 15 APRIL 2013

Application for approval of the Queens Supermarket (WA) and SDA Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Queens Supermarket (WA) and SDA Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] Clause 36−Introduction of Change of the Agreement does not provide for employee representatives other than the “Union” and so does not meet the requirements of s.205(1)(b) of the Act. As a consequence, pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 1 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] The Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 22 April 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 April 2017.

COMMISSIONER

 1   Section 2.09 and Schedule 2.2 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE400771  PR535683>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0