| [2020] FWCA 3087 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Shire of Mundaring
(AG2020/1612)
Shire of Mundaring Municipal Employees Collective Enterprise Agreement 2017
Local government administration | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 12 JUNE 2020 |
Application for variation of the Shire of Mundaring Municipal Employees Collective Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Shire of Mundaring Municipal Employees Collective Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made by Shire of Mundaring pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[5] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 12 June 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE505463 PR720151>
- AGLC
- Shire of Mundaring [2020] FWCA 3087
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 3087
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the proposed variation was a "genuine variation" under section 235(1) of the Fair Work Act. The FWC considered whether the application met the criteria for a genuine variation, which included whether the change was necessary to achieve a fair and efficient workplace. The FWC also had to consider whether the proposed change was fair and reasonable in all the circumstances. The Shire argued that the reduction in overtime loading was necessary to ensure the financial viability of the Shire and to remain competitive in attracting and retaining staff. The union opposed the application, arguing that it would result in a significant reduction in employee remuneration without any corresponding benefits.
The FWC found that the proposed variation was a genuine variation as it was necessary to achieve a fair and efficient workplace. The FWC noted that the Shire was facing significant financial difficulties and that the proposed variation was a reasonable and fair response to those difficulties. The FWC also found that the proposed variation was not unreasonable in all the circumstances, as the employees would still receive a higher rate of pay for working on Sundays than for working on weekdays. The FWC approved the application, and the overtime loading rate for employees who worked on Sundays was reduced.
The FWC's decision was based on a careful consideration of the evidence and the relevant legal principles. The FWC found that the proposed variation was necessary to achieve a fair and efficient workplace and that it was not unreasonable in all the circumstances. The decision highlights the importance of considering the financial viability of employers when making decisions about variations to enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.