Shimizu & Tanner

Case [2011] FamCA 271


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SHIMIZU & TANNER [2011] FamCA 271
FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY –  Contribution – Kennon & Kennon adjustment sought – Disparity in relation to which assets comprise the asset pool for division between the husband and the wife – Add backs – Husband’s high post separation earnings – Should they form part of asset pool – Wife asserts donations by husband should be added back to the pool – Husband’s donations regarded as discretionary expenditure – Whether husband has tax liability in Japan on earnings not taxed elsewhere – Section 75(2) factors – Just and equitable considerations – Net assets overall 40% to husband and 60% to wife
Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) s117
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s140
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 75(2), 79
Family Law Rules 2004
Cerini & Cerini [1998] FamCA 14
Hickey & Hickey (2003) FLC 93-143
In the marriage of Kowaliw & Kowaliw (1981) FLC 91-092
Kennon & Kennon (1997) FLC 92-757
Kouper & Kouper (No 3) [2009] FamCA 1080
Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705
Omacini & Omacini (2005) FLC 93-218
Wilde & Wilde [2007] FamCA 1044
APPLICANT: Mr Shimizu
RESPONDENT: Ms Tanner
FILE NUMBER: SYF 2746 of 2006
DATE DELIVERED: 20 April 2011
PLACE DELIVERED: Melbourne
PLACE HEARD: Sydney
JUDGMENT OF: Chief Justice Bryant
HEARING DATE: 16, 17, 18 & 21 September 2009

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Lloyd
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Newnhams Solicitors
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Ms Gillies
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Enza Ruscica

Orders

  1. That on or before 10 July 2011 the husband do all necessary acts and things and sign all necessary documents to transfer to the wife all of his right title and interest in the property known and situate at W Street, Sydney Suburb 1, NSW (“the property”), having Folio Identifier …, free of all mortgages, charges and encumbrances including but not limited to the Registered First Mortgage to Perpetual Trustees Australia Limited (“the mortgage”); and

  2. That simultaneously upon, or prior to, compliance by the husband with final Order 1 herein, the parties do all acts and things as shall be necessary to discharge, at the husband’s sole cost, the mortgage(s) registered against the home.

  3. That within twenty-one (21) days of the date of the Orders the husband pay to the wife the sum of $646,669.00.

  4. That within 14 days of compliance by the husband with final orders 1, 2 and 3, the wife transfer to the husband, at the husband’s sole expense, all her right title and interest in Motor vehicle 1 having registration number …

  5. That the wife be declared the sole and beneficial owner to the exclusion of the husband of the following:

    (a)The furniture and household contents in the former matrimonial home other than the items referred to in Schedule 1 attached herein.

    (b)       All superannuation entitlements in her sole name. 

  6. That the husband be declared the sole owner to the exclusion of the wife of the following: -

    (a)The items…

Continue reading Shimizu & Tanner

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Shimizu & Tanner [2011] FamCA 271
Case
[2011] FamCA 271
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned a property dispute between a husband and wife, heard by Chief Justice Bryant. The central disagreement revolved around the composition of the asset pool for division, with the wife seeking a *Kennon & Kennon* adjustment and arguing for the inclusion of the husband's significant post-separation earnings and certain donations he had made. The husband contended that his Japanese earnings, which were not taxed elsewhere, should not form part of the asset pool, while the wife asserted that his donations should be added back.

The court was required to determine whether the husband's post-separation earnings and his discretionary expenditure in the form of donations should be included in the asset pool for division. Additionally, the court had to consider the implications of the husband's tax liability in Japan on his earnings that had not been subject to taxation elsewhere, and whether these factors, along with other section 75(2) considerations, warranted an adjustment to the overall division of net assets, which stood at 40% to the husband and 60% to the wife.

Chief Justice Bryant reasoned that the husband's donations were a form of discretionary expenditure and therefore should not be added back to the asset pool. The court also found that the husband's high post-separation earnings were not to be included in the asset pool, nor was his Japanese tax liability to be considered. The court ultimately ordered the transfer of the husband's interest in the W Street property to the wife, along with a significant monetary payment from the husband to the wife. The division of other assets, including motor vehicles and household contents, was also specified, along with orders concerning superannuation entitlements and indemnities between the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That on or before 10 July 2011 the husband do all necessary acts and things and sign all necessary documents to transfer to the wife all of his right title and interest in the property known and situate at W Street, Sydney Suburb 1, NSW (“the property”), having Folio Identifier …, free of all mortgages, charges and encumbrances including but not limited to the Registered First Mortgage to Perpetual Trustees Australia Limited (“the mortgage”); and

2.

That simultaneously upon, or prior to, compliance by the husband with final Order 1 herein, the parties do all acts and things as shall be necessary to discharge, at the husband’s sole cost, the mortgage(s) registered against the home.

3.

That within twenty-one (21) days of the date of the Orders the husband pay to the wife the sum of $646,669.00.

4.

That within 14 days of compliance by the husband with final orders 1, 2 and 3, the wife transfer to the husband, at the husband’s sole expense, all her right title and interest in Motor vehicle 1 having registration number …

5.

That the wife be declared the sole and beneficial owner to the exclusion of the husband of the following:

(a) The furniture and household contents in the former matrimonial home other than the items referred to in Schedule 1 attached herein.

(b) All superannuation entitlements in her sole name.

6.

That the husband be declared the sole owner to the exclusion of the wife of the following: -

(a) The items listed in Schedule 1 herein and the wife make the said items available to the husband for collection at his expense on 7 days notice.

(b) Motor vehicle 2 located outside the Commonwealth of Australia.

(c) Motor vehicle 3 located outside the Commonwealth of Australia.

(d) Motor vehicle 4 having registration number …

(e) Motor vehicle 5 having registration number … subject to all and any encumbrances and charges in respect of the motor vehicle and to be at liberty to arrange the collection of the vehicle from the wife at a location nominated by her upon 48 hours notice of his intention to collect the vehicle.

(f) That pursuant to section 90MT(1)(a) of the Family Law Act 1975 the applicant husband as a member of the AMP/Company 1 Superannuation Scheme, having membership number … (“AMP Super Scheme”) and the Trustee of the AMP Super Scheme do all acts and things, sign all documents and give all consents so that whenever a splittable payment becomes available to the applicant husband from his interest in the AMP Super Scheme that the wife is entitled to an amount calculated in accordance with Part 6 of the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001, using a base amount of $97,500.00 and there is a corresponding reduction in the entitlement of the husband in the superannuation scheme had these orders not been made. This Order binds the trustee or trustees from time to time of the AMP Super Scheme.

7.

That for the purposes of Order 6 herein that:

(a) The base amount to be allocated to the respondent wife in respect of the AMP Super Scheme is $97,500.00 and

(b) The operative time for this Order is the date of the making of these Orders and this Order is to take effect from the date of the making of these Orders.

8.

In respect of all other property and/or other financial resources not specifically referred to herein that each party be declared the sole and beneficial owner, to the exclusion of the other, of all such property and/or financial resources in their name, control and/or possession as at the date hereof.

9.

That, except as these Orders provide to the contrary:

(a) the husband by this Order hereby indemnifies the wife from and in respect of all actions, claims, suits and demands as may be made against the wife in relation to all liabilities in the name of the husband; and

(b) the wife by this Order hereby indemnifies the husband from and in respect of all actions, claims, suits and demands as may be made against the husband in relation to all liabilities in the name of the wife; and

(c) except as these Orders provide to the contrary, each of the husband and wife releases the other from all debts owing from one to the other.

(d) That in the event that either party refuses or neglects, within a reasonable time of a request to do so, to execute any Deed or instrument necessary to give effect to all or any of the Orders made herein, the Registrar of the Court be appointed, pursuant to section 106A, to execute such Deed or instrument in the name of the said party and to do all acts and things necessary to give validity and operation to the said Deed or instrument.

10.

That the Registrar is authorised to execute any necessary instrument upon being satisfied by affidavit that neglect or default, as the case may be, has occurred.

11.

That the parties have leave to apply, upon seven (7) days notice to each other party and the Court, in respect of the implementation and/or clarification of these Orders herein including any application for costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.