SHEPPARD & SHERWIN & ANOR
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 1460
•27 June 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Sheppard and Sherwin and Anor [2017] FCCA 1460
[2017] FCCA 1460
27 June 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Sheppard & Sherwin & Anor*, heard before Judge McNab, the application concerned a dispute between the parties, the precise nature of which is not detailed in the provided text. The court's orders indicate that the matter was being prepared for trial.
The primary legal issue before the court was the management of the proceedings leading up to the trial. This included determining the trial date, the admissibility of existing affidavit evidence, the timeline for filing further affidavit evidence, and the relief sought by the Applicant. The court also addressed the procedural requirement for filing outlines of case.
Judge McNab made several orders to facilitate the trial. The application was scheduled for trial on 3 November 2017, with an estimated hearing duration of one day. The existing affidavits were to stand as evidence in chief, with a deadline of 4pm on 13 October 2017 for the filing of any further affidavit evidence. The Applicant's proposed final orders of 23 June 2017 were confirmed as the relief sought. The court also noted that no outline of case was required. Costs were reserved.
The primary legal issue before the court was the management of the proceedings leading up to the trial. This included determining the trial date, the admissibility of existing affidavit evidence, the timeline for filing further affidavit evidence, and the relief sought by the Applicant. The court also addressed the procedural requirement for filing outlines of case.
Judge McNab made several orders to facilitate the trial. The application was scheduled for trial on 3 November 2017, with an estimated hearing duration of one day. The existing affidavits were to stand as evidence in chief, with a deadline of 4pm on 13 October 2017 for the filing of any further affidavit evidence. The Applicant's proposed final orders of 23 June 2017 were confirmed as the relief sought. The court also noted that no outline of case was required. Costs were reserved.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Discovery
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0