SHEPPARD & SHERWIN & ANOR

Case [2017] FCCA 1460


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SHEPPARD & SHERWIN & ANOR [2017] FCCA 1460
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Trial directions – application made by Paternal Grandmother in relation to children – parents want to have no contact with Applicant – whether a family report is necessary – matter fixed for trial without requiring a family report – impact of proceedings on children.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975, ss.60B, 61B, 69ZN(3)

Cases cited:

Church & Overton and Anor [2008] FamCA 953

Applicant: MS SHEPPARD
First Respondent: MR SHERWIN
Second Respondent: MS SHERWIN
File Number: MLC 11964 of 2016
Judgment of: Judge McNab
Hearing date: 22 June 2017
Date of Last Submission: 22 June 2017
Delivered at: Melbourne
Delivered on: 27 June 2017

REPRESENTATION

Solicitors for the Applicant: Cantwell Family Lawyers
The Respondents in person

ORDERS

  1. The application be fixed for trial on 3 November 2017 at 10:00am with an estimated hearing time of 1 day.

  2. The affidavits filed by or on behalf of the parties stand as evidence in chief at the trial.

  3. Any party wishing to file further affidavit evidence shall do so by filing same by 4pm 13 October 2017.

  4. The minute of proposed final Orders of the Applicant filed on 23 June 2017 stand as the relief sought by the Applicant.

  5. Costs reserved.

AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A.There is no requirement for the parties to file an outline of case in this proceeding.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Sheppard & Sherwin & Anor is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT MELBOURNE

MLC 11964 of 2016

MS SHEPPARD

Applicant

And

MR SHERWIN

First Respondent

MS SHERWIN

Second Respondent

REASONS FOR DECISION

Introduction

  1. The applicant is the grandmother of X, born (omitted) 2004, and Y born (omitted) 2010 (‘the children’). Because of a substantial estrangement between the applicant paternal grandmother and the respondents, she has not seen the children and the respondents for about three years.

  2. The paternal grandmother seeks final orders in the terms filed on 22 June 2017, which include orders for the children to spend time with her every six weeks, on the day prior to birthdays and at Christmas time. She also seeks orders that she be permitted to communicate with the children by telephone once per fortnight and that she be permitted to send cards and gifts to the children and the parents are to ensure that those gifts and cards are provided to the children and that such gifts and cards have been sent by the grandmother. The respondents oppose the orders sought by the grandmother.

  3. This matter came before the Court on 22 June 2017 for mention as a result of orders the Court made by consent on 28 February 2017. Those orders provided in substance for the parties and the children to enrol with the children and participate in reportable family therapy at a cost to be shared equally between the applicant and the…

Continue reading SHEPPARD & SHERWIN & ANOR

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Sheppard and Sherwin and Anor [2017] FCCA 1460
Case
[2017] FCCA 1460
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Sheppard & Sherwin & Anor*, heard before Judge McNab, the application concerned a dispute between the parties, the precise nature of which is not detailed in the provided text. The court's orders indicate that the matter was being prepared for trial.

The primary legal issue before the court was the management of the proceedings leading up to the trial. This included determining the trial date, the admissibility of existing affidavit evidence, the timeline for filing further affidavit evidence, and the relief sought by the Applicant. The court also addressed the procedural requirement for filing outlines of case.

Judge McNab made several orders to facilitate the trial. The application was scheduled for trial on 3 November 2017, with an estimated hearing duration of one day. The existing affidavits were to stand as evidence in chief, with a deadline of 4pm on 13 October 2017 for the filing of any further affidavit evidence. The Applicant's proposed final orders of 23 June 2017 were confirmed as the relief sought. The court also noted that no outline of case was required. Costs were reserved.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The application be fixed for trial on 3 November 2017 at 10:00am with an estimated hearing time of 1 day.

2.

The affidavits filed by or on behalf of the parties stand as evidence in chief at the trial.

3.

Any party wishing to file further affidavit evidence shall do so by filing same by 4pm 13 October 2017.

4.

The minute of proposed final Orders of the Applicant filed on 23 June 2017 stand as the relief sought by the Applicant.

5.

Costs reserved.

AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A. There is no requirement for the parties to file an outline of case in this proceeding.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.