Shenzhen Fernfortune International Wines Co Limited v Bilyara Vineyards Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2019] ATMO 131
•2 September 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Shenzhen Fernfortune International Wines Co Limited v Bilyara Vineyards Pty Ltd [2019] ATMO 131
[2019] ATMO 131
2 September 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The decision of Robert Wilson in *Shenzhen Fernfortune International Wines Co Limited v Bilyara Vineyards Pty Ltd* concerned an application for trade mark registration. The applicant, Shenzhen Fernfortune International Wines Co Limited, sought to register its trade mark, and the opponent, Bilyara Vineyards Pty Ltd, opposed this application. The Registrar was required to decide whether to refuse or register the trade mark, taking into account the grounds of opposition raised by Bilyara Vineyards Pty Ltd.
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was to determine the extent to which the grounds of opposition relied upon by Bilyara Vineyards Pty Ltd had been established. Section 55 of the relevant Act mandates that the Registrar must decide on the registration of a trade mark having regard to the established grounds of opposition.
The Registrar found that the opponent, Bilyara Vineyards Pty Ltd, had failed to establish either of the grounds of opposition it had nominated. Consequently, the Registrar decided that the application could proceed to registration one month after the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed. In the event of an appeal, registration was to be stayed until the appeal was withdrawn or a court ordered otherwise. The Registrar also awarded costs against the opponent in favour of the applicant, applying the general rule that costs follow the event and referencing Schedule 8 of the Trade Mark Regulations 1995.
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was to determine the extent to which the grounds of opposition relied upon by Bilyara Vineyards Pty Ltd had been established. Section 55 of the relevant Act mandates that the Registrar must decide on the registration of a trade mark having regard to the established grounds of opposition.
The Registrar found that the opponent, Bilyara Vineyards Pty Ltd, had failed to establish either of the grounds of opposition it had nominated. Consequently, the Registrar decided that the application could proceed to registration one month after the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed. In the event of an appeal, registration was to be stayed until the appeal was withdrawn or a court ordered otherwise. The Registrar also awarded costs against the opponent in favour of the applicant, applying the general rule that costs follow the event and referencing Schedule 8 of the Trade Mark Regulations 1995.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Shenzhen Fernfortune International Wines Co Limited v Bilyara Vineyards Pty Ltd [2019] ATMO 131
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
McCormick & Company Inc v McCormick
[2000] FCA 1335
Hugo Boss AG v Jackson International Trading Co Kurt D Bruhl Gesellschaft MbH & Co KG
[1999] ATMO 23
Fry Consulting Pty Ltd v Sports Warehouse Inc (No 2)
[2012] FCA 81