Sheedy v Coopers & Lybrand

Case

[1992] QCA 331

7/09/1992

No judgment structure available for this case.

[1992] QCA 331

COOPERS AND LYBRAND (A FIRM) Respondent
BRISBANE
..DATE 07/09/92

COURT OF APPEAL

DAVIES JA PINCUS JA

No A187/92

JACK SHEEDY Applicant
V.

JUDGMENT view it does involve a question of law which is of importance.

That being whether the word “hearing” in Rule 193 subrule 1 of the Magistrates Court Rules is limited to the hearing of an action or a counterclaim. I would therefore grant leave to appeal and order that the costs of this application be costs in the appeal.

PINCUS JA: I agree.

DAVIES JA: The order of the Court is that leave to appeal is granted. The costs of this application are to be costs in the appeal.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0