Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sheedy v Alveco Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATCD 162 Hearing dates: 9 December 2020 Date of orders: 12 March 2021 [amended 17 March 2021] Decision date: 12 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: K Ross, Senior Member Decision: The decision issued on 12 March 2021 is amended pursuant to section 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 and should read as follows: (amendments are shown in bold type)
1 Alveco Pty Ltd t/as Concorde Motor Homes and Caravans is to pay to Leon Sheedy and Roslyn Sheedy the sum of $64,330 on or before 26 March 2021.
Reasons: Refund of purchase price of caravan.
2 Alveco Pty Ltd t/as Concorde Motor Homes and Caravans is to collect the caravan from the applicants at XXX Warwick Road Tamworth 2340 (or such other address as may be advised in writing by the applicants to Alveco Pty Ltd t/as Concorde Motor Homes and Caravans) on or before 26 March 2021.
3 Alveco Pty Ltd t/as Concorde Motor Homes and Caravans AND Cosy Sara Pty Ltd t/as Cosy Cab Caravans jointly and severally are to pay to Leon Sheedy and Roslyn Sheedy the sum of $2620.00 on or before 26 March 2021.
Reasons: Refund of registration $324.00, insurance $837.00, accommodation costs $1186.00 and filing fee $273.00.
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW — Consumer guarantees — renewal application — What constitutes repair — Major failure to comply with consumer guarantees — Rejection period
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
Australian Consumer Law (NSW)
Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Blessed Sydney Constructions Pty Ltd v Vasudevan [2018] NSWCATAP 98
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jayco Corporation Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1672
Texts Cited: Nil
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Leon Sheedy & Roslyn Sheedy (Applicants)
Alveco Pty Ltd t/as Concorde Motor Homes and Caravans (First Respondent)
Cosy Sara Pty Ltd t/as Cosy Cab Caravans (Second Respondent)Representation: Applicants (Self-represented)
A Stocker (Director) (First Respondent)Counsel:
Solicitor:
D Godwin (Second Respondent)
Westgate Legal Associates (Second Respondent)
File Number(s): MV 20/17117 (Renewal proceedings)
MV 19/54468 (Primary proceedings)Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
-
This application is a renewal application filed by the applicant consumers (Mr and Mrs Sheedy) in respect of a caravan (the caravan) which they purchased in October 2018 from the first respondent (Concorde Motor Homes) for a purchase price of $64,330.00 (the purchase price). The caravan was manufactured by the second respondent (Cosy Cabs).
-
On 5 December 2019 Mr and Mrs Sheedy filed an application in the Tribunal, seeking a full refund of the purchase price, on the basis that there had been a major failure to comply with the Australian Consumer Law guarantees that the caravan be of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose. Mr and Mrs Sheedy complained that the caravan was faulty. Their principal complaints concerned the floor which they said was soft and required replacement.
-
On 28 January 2020, following conciliation in the Tribunal,…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Sheedy v Alveco Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] NSWCATCD 162
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the tribunal was whether the failure to comply with the consumer guarantees constituted a major failure, which would entitle the Sheedys to reject the caravan and obtain a refund of the purchase price. The tribunal also had to determine whether the Sheedys were entitled to additional costs associated with the rejection of the caravan, such as registration, insurance, accommodation, and filing fees.
In its decision, the tribunal found that the failure to comply with the consumer guarantees did indeed constitute a major failure, entitling the Sheedys to reject the caravan and obtain a refund of the purchase price. The tribunal also found that the Sheedys were entitled to additional costs associated with the rejection of the caravan, such as registration, insurance, accommodation, and filing fees. As a result, the tribunal ordered Alveco Pty Ltd to pay the Sheedys a total of $64,330, which included the purchase price of the caravan and additional costs. The tribunal also ordered Alveco Pty Ltd to collect the caravan from the Sheedys and for Alveco Pty Ltd and Cosy Sara Pty Ltd to jointly and severally pay the Sheedys an additional $2620, which included registration, insurance, accommodation costs, and a filing fee.
Orders
Orders of the court
The decision issued on 12 March 2021 is amended pursuant to section 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 and should read as follows: (amendments are shown in bold type)
1 Alveco Pty Ltd t/as Concorde Motor Homes and Caravans is to pay to Leon Sheedy and Roslyn Sheedy the sum of $64,330 on or before 26 March 2021.
Reasons: Refund of purchase price of caravan.
2 Alveco Pty Ltd t/as Concorde Motor Homes and Caravans is to collect the caravan from the applicants at XXX Warwick Road Tamworth 2340 (or such other address as may be advised in writing by the applicants to Alveco Pty Ltd t/as Concorde Motor Homes and Caravans) on or before 26 March 2021.
3 Alveco Pty Ltd t/as Concorde Motor Homes and Caravans AND Cosy Sara Pty Ltd t/as Cosy Cab Caravans jointly and severally are to pay to Leon Sheedy and Roslyn Sheedy the sum of $2620.00 on or before 26 March 2021.
Reasons: Refund of registration $324.00, insurance $837.00, accommodation costs $1186.00 and filing fee $273.00.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.