FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sheahan v Cooper [1999] FCA 766
BANKRUPTCY – agreement to transfer share of property – whether agreement created a trust in the equitable interest in the property – transfer occurred later – whether transfer a sham under s 120 – whether interest transferred at all – whether consideration existed for the transfer – whether transfer for market value.
BANKRUPTCY – whether bankrupt was, or was about to become insolvent at the time of transfer of land.
TRUSTS – whether constructive trust could be created where trustee in bankruptcy asserted title.
TRUSTS – apportionment of interests under Baumgartner principle.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 116, 120 and 121
Bankruptcy Legislation Amendment Act 1996 Sch 1 Pt 2 Item 457Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 applied
Sharrment Pty Ltd v Official Receiver in Bankruptcy (1988) 18 FCR 449 considered
Donnelly (Trustee of Estate of Edelsten) v Edelsten (1994) 49 FCR 384 considered
Ex parte Holthausen; Re Scheibler (1874) LR 9 Ch App 722 considered
Re Bastable; Ex parte Trustee [1901] 2 KB 518 considered
Re Sharpe [1980] 1 All ER 198 considered
Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 applied
Osborn; Ex parte Trustee of the Property of Osborn (A Bankrupt) v Osborn (1990) 25 FCR 547 distinguished
Calverley v Green (1985) 155 CLR 242 considered
Ashton v Prentice (Federal Court, Hill J, unreported, 23 October 1998) consideredJOHN SHEAHAN as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of RICHARD JOHN COOPER v NOELENE MICHELLE COOPER
S 7017 OF 1999
MANSFIELD J
ADELAIDE
8 JUNE 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
S 7017 OF 1999
IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF
RICHARD JOHN COOPER
BETWEEN:
JOHN SHEAHAN
as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of
RICHARD JOHN COOPER
ApplicantAND:
NOELENE MICHELLE COOPER
RespondentJUDGE:
MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER:
4 JUNE 1999
WHERE MADE:
ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The application is dismissed.
2.Pursuant to O 52 r 14 the time from which the period runs for the institution of an appeal be fixed at 8 June 1999.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
S 7017 OF 1999
IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF
RICHARD JOHN COOPER
BETWEEN:
JOHN SHEAHAN
as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of
RICHARD JOHN COOPER
ApplicantAND:
NOELENE MICHELLE COOPER
Respondent
JUDGE:
MANSFIELD J
DATE:
8 JUNE 1999
PLACE:
ADELAIDE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The claim
The applicant John Sheahan (“Mr Sheahan”) was appointed trustee of the bankrupt estate of Richard John Cooper (“Mr Cooper”) on 20 April 1998.
Mr Sheahan promptly identified the land in Certificate of Title Register Book Volume 4257 Folio 921 (“the property”) apparently as being owned by Mr Cooper and by the respondent Noelene Michelle Cooper (“Ms Cooper”). The land was acquired by Mr Cooper and Ms Cooper on 26 February 1986, shortly before they were married in August…
Continue reading Sheahan v Cooper
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Sheahan v Cooper [1999] FCA 766
- Case
- [1999] FCA 766
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court determined that the agreement did not create a trust in the equitable interest in the property, as there was no intention to create a trust. The court also found that the transfer was not a sham and that the interest was indeed transferred. However, the court held that the transfer was not for market value, as there was no evidence of consideration for the transfer. Furthermore, the court found that the bankrupt was, or was about to become, insolvent at the time of the transfer. The court also considered the Baumgartner principle and determined that the interests should be apportioned accordingly.
The court dismissed the application and fixed the time for the institution of an appeal. The decision highlights the importance of clear intentions and consideration when transferring property interests, as well as the consequences of insolvency on property transfers.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application is dismissed.
2. Pursuant to O 52 r 14 the time from which the period runs for the institution of an appeal be fixed at 8 June 1999.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.