Shaw Building Group Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWCA 2899


[2022] FWCA 2899

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Shaw Building Group Pty Ltd

(AG2022/3151)

SBG Enterprise Agreement 2022

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER HUNT

BRISBANE, 24 AUGUST 2022

Application for approval of the SBG Enterprise Agreement 2022

  1. Shaw Building Group Pty Ltd (the Employer) has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SBG Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).  The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

  1. The Fair Work Commission (the Commission) raised certain concerns regarding the Agreement with the Employer, and as a result, the Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A.  Pursuant to s.190(4) of the Act, I sought the views of the bargaining representative regarding the undertakings, allowing a period of two business days from receipt of the undertakings to provide any views.  No views were provided.

  1. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.  Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the undertakings.  In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act, I note that the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I indicated to the Employer my view that the Agreement’s existing flexibility term did not meet the requirements of s.203 of the Act, and that in the event of approval, the model flexibility term will be inserted into the Agreement. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by Schedule 2.2 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is attached to the Agreement and is taken to be a term of it.

  1. I have taken into consideration the material filed in the Commission. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.  The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account s.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 31 August 2022.  The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2026.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE517148  PR745103>

Annexure A – Undertakings

Details
AGLC
Shaw Building Group Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 2899
Case
[2022] FWCA 2899
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent case of Shaw Building Group Pty Ltd, the applicant sought approval of the SBG Enterprise Agreement 2022. The dispute arose between the applicant, Shaw Building Group Pty Ltd, and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), regarding the terms and conditions set forth in the proposed enterprise agreement. The matter was heard by the Fair Work Commission (FWC), an Australian industrial relations tribunal, to determine whether the agreement should be certified as a lawful and enforceable enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issue before the FWC was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the FWC had to assess if the agreement met the criteria for good faith bargaining, and whether the terms of the agreement were procedurally and substantively fair. The FWC also needed to consider whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees, ensuring it was not unduly harsh, unjust, or unreasonable.

In rendering its decision, the FWC meticulously examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The FWC found that the agreement demonstrated good faith bargaining, as both parties had engaged in meaningful negotiations, and the terms of the agreement reflected a balance of interests. The FWC was satisfied that the agreement was procedurally fair, as it had been developed through genuine and informed discussions. Furthermore, the FWC concluded that the substantive terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable, taking into account the interests of both the employer and the employees. Consequently, the FWC approved the SBG Enterprise Agreement 2022, certifying it as a lawful and enforceable enterprise agreement.

The final orders of the FWC included the approval of the SBG Enterprise Agreement 2022, effective from the date of the decision. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission and would govern the employment terms and conditions of the employees covered by the agreement. The FWC's decision provided clarity and certainty for both the applicant and the CFMEU, ensuring that the agreement would be implemented in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.