Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha v Sharpline Stainless Steel Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2008] ATMO 62
•17 July 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha v Sharpline Stainless Steel Pty Ltd [2008] ATMO 62
[2008] ATMO 62
17 July 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This decision concerns an opposition to a trade mark application brought by Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha against Sharpline Stainless Steel Pty Ltd. The Registrar of Trade Marks was required to determine whether to register the opposed trade mark, considering the grounds of opposition raised by Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha.
The central legal issue was the extent to which the grounds of opposition had been established, and consequently, how the Registrar should exercise their discretion under section 55 of the Act regarding the registration of the trade mark. This involved assessing whether the opposed goods and services conflicted with the opponent's established rights.
The Registrar found that the opponent had established its opposition in relation to certain goods, specifically 'rotisseries; food warming apparatus, and dishwashers'. Consequently, the Registrar refused to register the trade mark in its entirety as applied for. However, the Registrar offered the applicant an opportunity to amend the specification of goods to exclude the conflicting items. If the applicant elected to delete these goods within two weeks, the trade mark application could proceed to registration for the remaining goods, namely 'Sinks' (Class 11), 'Trolleys' (Class 12), and 'Work benches' (Class 20), one month after the decision, unless an appeal was filed. The Registrar also ordered the applicant to pay the opponent's costs.
The central legal issue was the extent to which the grounds of opposition had been established, and consequently, how the Registrar should exercise their discretion under section 55 of the Act regarding the registration of the trade mark. This involved assessing whether the opposed goods and services conflicted with the opponent's established rights.
The Registrar found that the opponent had established its opposition in relation to certain goods, specifically 'rotisseries; food warming apparatus, and dishwashers'. Consequently, the Registrar refused to register the trade mark in its entirety as applied for. However, the Registrar offered the applicant an opportunity to amend the specification of goods to exclude the conflicting items. If the applicant elected to delete these goods within two weeks, the trade mark application could proceed to registration for the remaining goods, namely 'Sinks' (Class 11), 'Trolleys' (Class 12), and 'Work benches' (Class 20), one month after the decision, unless an appeal was filed. The Registrar also ordered the applicant to pay the opponent's costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
The Sunrider Corporation v Vitasoy International Holdings Limited [2009] ATMO 42
Cases Citing This Decision
1
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
0
Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths
[1999] FCA 1020
E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited
[2008] FCA 934
McCormick & Company Inc v McCormick
[2000] FCA 1335