Sharon Bowker; Annette Coombe; Stephen Zwarts v DP World Melbourne Limited T/A DP World; Maritime Union of Australia, The Victorian Branch and Others
[2015] FWC 5221
•30 JULY 2015
| [2015] FWC 5221 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.789FC - Application for an order to stop bullying
Sharon Bowker; Annette Coombe; Stephen Zwarts
v
DP World Melbourne Limited T/A DP World; Maritime Union of Australia, The Victorian Branch and Others
(AB2014/1260; AB2014/1261; AB2014/1266)DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 30 JULY 2015 |
Application for an FWC order to stop bullying – Application for claim of Legal Professional Privilege and Without Prejudice Privilege
[1] On 2 July 2015 I made an order directed to DP World for the production of certain documents. In producing documents DP World has identified a number of documents that are the subject of claims of legal professional privilege (LPP) or of without prejudice privilege (WPP).
[2] I have given consideration to the written submissions filed by the parties and I have reviewed the documents produced by DP World in respect of which LPP is said to attach. I have determined to uphold the LPP claim respect of these documents except for:
- An extract of the transcript recording evidence given by Annette Coombe and Sharon Bowker in the Federal Court of Australia attached to an email from Erin Hawthorne to David Gunzburg dated 8 July 2014; and
- Federal Court of Australia practice note CM 7 expert witnesses in proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia attached to an email from Erin Hawthorne 2DGHR services dated 5 June 2014.
[3] These two documents will be made available for inspection on application.
[4] As to the documents in relation to which a claim for WPP is made, I have determined to defer any decision in relation to these documents until such time as a party seeks to introduce any one of these documents into evidence. It is evident from the review of those documents that the party to whom a document was sent, or from whom a document was received, will have the document and it seems unnecessary that these documents be separately inspected.
[5] Reasons for this decision will be issued in due course.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR570007>
0
0