SHARMA (Migration)

Case

[2020] AATA 3552

24 July 2020


SHARMA (Migration) [2020] AATA 3552 (24 July 2020)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr DEEPAK SHARMA

CASE NUMBER:  1822239

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2018/262509

MEMBER:Peter Haag

DATE:24 July 2020

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:

·cl.500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

Statement made on 24 July 2020 at 8:32am

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – enrolment status – evidence of enrolment – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cl 500.211

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 11 July 2018 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 16 January 2018. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.

  3. The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl.500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) because the delegate was not satisfied the applicant was enrolled in a course of study at the time of decision.

  4. The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 23 July 2020 to give evidence and present arguments.

  5. The applicant was assisted in relation to the review by their registered migration agent.

  6. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  7. The criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are set out in Part 500 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations. The primary criteria in cl.500.211 to cl.500.218 must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria. The issue in the present case is whether the applicant is currently enrolled in a course of study.

  8. Clause 500.211 relevantly requires that at the time of this decision the applicant is enrolled in a course of study: cl.500.211(a). The applicant does not claim to meet any of the alternative criteria in cl.500.211.

  9. ‘Course of study’ is relevantly defined in cl.500.111 of the Regulations as a ‘full-time registered course’. ‘Registered course’ is defined in r.1.03 of the Regulations as a course of education or training provided by an institution, body or person that is registered, under Division 3 of Part 2 of the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000, to provide the course to overseas students.

  10. The applicant said in evidence to the Tribunal that he is currently enrolled in a course of study; and, he corroborated his evidence by providing to the Tribunal a Confirmation of Enrolment (CoE) document that established the applicant is enrolled in the Bachelor of Business (Accounting) provided by Gateway Business College. Therefore, the Tribunal is satisfied that at the time of this decision, the applicant is enrolled in a course of study and accordingly cl.500.211 is met.

  11. Given the above findings, the appropriate course is to remit the application for the visa to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa.

    DECISION

  12. The Tribunal remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:

    Peter Haag
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Statutory Construction

  • Remedies

  • Jurisdiction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0