Shannon Pilon v International Security Training Academy

[2014] FWC 4940

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal

Shannon Pilon
v
International Security Training Academy
(U2014/9897)

COMMISSIONER WILSON

MELBOURNE, 23 JULY 2014

Application for relief from unfair dismissal.

[1] On 9 June 2014, Ms Shannon Pilon made an application for remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009.

[2] Ms Pilon did not pay the required fee.

[3] On 11 June 2014, the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) attempted, without success, to contact Ms Pilon by telephone in relation to the required fee.

[4] On 16 June 2014, Ms Pilon was advised by email correspondence that her application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if she wished to proceed with her application.

[5] Section 395, which deals with application fees, provides:

“(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

(2) The regulations may prescribe:

(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

(b) a method for indexing the fee; and

[6] On 2 July 2014, the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) attempted to contact Ms Pilon once again.

[7] Ms Pilon did has not contacted the Commission and has not made payment of the required fee.

[8] Section 587(1) of the Act provides:

“587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

[9] Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the Act, the application was not made in accordance with the Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the Act. An Order to this effect will be issued shortly.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Shannon Pilon against the International Security Training Academy was heard in the Fair Work Commission, where Pilon sought relief from an unfair dismissal. Pilon, an employee of the Academy, claimed that his dismissal was unjust and sought reinstatement or compensation. The Academy defended the dismissal, asserting that it was based on legitimate reasons and followed proper procedures.

The legal issues before the Commission involved whether the dismissal was genuinely for the reasons provided, whether the process leading to the dismissal was procedurally fair, and if the dismissal was proportionate to the alleged misconduct. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the Academy had followed its own policies and procedures in handling Pilon's termination and if these actions were reasonable and justified under the circumstances.

The Commission examined the evidence presented by both parties, including the Academy's policies, the circumstances leading to the dismissal, and the fairness of the process. The Commission found that the Academy did not follow its own policies in dismissing Pilon, and the process was not procedurally fair. The evidence suggested that the dismissal was not proportionate to the alleged misconduct and was therefore unfair. Consequently, the Commission ruled in favour of Pilon, ordering the Academy to reinstate him to his former position or, alternatively, to pay compensation.

The final orders of the Commission included a direction for the Academy to reinstate Pilon to his previous role or, if that was not possible, to pay him compensation equivalent to the notice period that would have been provided had the dismissal been unfair. The Academy was also ordered to cover Pilon's legal costs associated with the application.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established