Shand and Sharrock and Anor
Case
•
[2016] FCCA 2234
•5 September 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Shand and Sharrock and Anor [2016] FCCA 2234
[2016] FCCA 2234
5 September 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of South Australia, in a decision by Judge Brown, considered an application filed by Ms Shand. The application concerned a dispute involving the Commissioner of the South Australian Police.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to grant Ms Shand's application. The Court was also required to determine the appropriate costs order, specifically in relation to the Commissioner's expenses incurred in responding to a subpoena issued at Ms Shand's request.
Judge Brown dismissed Ms Shand's application. The Court ordered Ms Shand to pay the costs of the Commissioner of the South Australian Police, totalling $1,970.50, for documents supplied to the court pursuant to a subpoena issued on Ms Shand's behalf.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to grant Ms Shand's application. The Court was also required to determine the appropriate costs order, specifically in relation to the Commissioner's expenses incurred in responding to a subpoena issued at Ms Shand's request.
Judge Brown dismissed Ms Shand's application. The Court ordered Ms Shand to pay the costs of the Commissioner of the South Australian Police, totalling $1,970.50, for documents supplied to the court pursuant to a subpoena issued on Ms Shand's behalf.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Shand and Sharrock and Anor (No.2) [2016] FCCA 2774
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
8
McIlwain v Ramsey Food Packaging Pty Ltd
[2005] FCA 1233
Moriarty & Moriarty
[2009] FamCA 369
Batten v Container Terminal Management Services Limited
[2001] FCA 374