Sfeir and Associates Investments Pty Ltd v Bayside Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1626


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Sfeir & Associates Investments Pty Ltd v Bayside Council [2017] NSWLEC 1626
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 24 October 2017
Date of orders: 06 November 2017
Decision date: 06 November 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Bish C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Sfeir & Associates Investments Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Bayside Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Mr P Saab, Macquarie Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr S Schneider, Houston Dearn O’Connor (Respondent)
File Number(s):2017/163714
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans and documentation as the plans and documentation relied upon for the purpose of the development application:

Plan Details

Author

Date

Existing Conditions/Demolition Plan & Site Plan, Drawing No. 01, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Site Context Plan, Drawing No. 02, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Site Plan, Basement and Ground Floor Plan, Drawing No. 03, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Streetscape Elevation, Drawing No. 04, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Basement Level 2, Drawing No. 05, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Basement Level 1, Drawing No. 06, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Ground Floor Plan, Drawing No. 07, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

First Floor Plan, Drawing No. 08, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Second Floor Plan, Drawing No. 09, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Third Floor Plan, Drawing No. 10, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Roof Plan, Drawing No. 11, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Elevations, Drawing No. 12, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Elevations, Drawing No. 13, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Sections, Drawing No. 14, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Sections, Drawing No. 15, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Accessible Unit Floor Plan, Drawing No. 16, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

External Finishes Schedule, Drawing No. 17, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Window & Door Schedule, Drawing No. 18, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Sun Shadow Diagrams (June), Drawing No. 19, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Sun Shadow Diagrams (Sept), Drawing No. 20, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Cross Flow Ventilation, Drawing No. 21, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

GFA Calculation Plans, Drawing No. 22, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Perspective Views, Drawing No. 23, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Ramp Long Sections, Drawing No. 24, Issue E

CAD3

25 October 2017

Landscape Intent, Drawing No. 1646-01, Issue B

Jackie Amos Landscape Architect

25 October 2017

Ground Floor Landscape Plan, Drawing No. 1646-02, Issue C

Jackie Amos Landscape Architect

25 October 2017

Basement Landscape Plan, Drawing No. 1646-03, Issue C

Jackie Amos Landscape Architect

25 October 2017

Typical Cross Section Landscape, Drawing No. 1646-04, Issue A

Jackie Amos Landscape Architect

21 March 2017

Proposed Plants, Drawing No. 1646-05, Issue B

Jackie Amos Landscape Architect

25 October 2017

Proposed Plants, Drawing No. 1646-06, Issue A

Jackie Amos Landscape Architect

25 October 2017

Stormwater Concept Plan Basement Level, Sheet 1 of 2, Drawing No. 101, Issue A, dated 10 February 2017

Australian Consulting Engineers

21 March 2017

Stormwater Concept Plan Basement Level, Sheet 2 of 2, Drawing No. 102, Issue A, dated 10 February 2017

Australian Consulting Engineers

21 March 2017

Stormwater Concept Plan Ground Level, Drawing No. 103, Issue A, dated 10 February 2017

Australian Consulting Engineers

21 March 2017

Catchment Plan, Drawing No. 104, Issue A, dated 10 January 2017

Australian Consulting Engineers

21 March 2017

OSD & WSUD Details, Sheet 1 of 2, Drawing No. 105, Issue A, dated 10 January 2017

Australian Consulting Engineers

21 March 2017

OSD & WSUD Details, Sheet 2 of 2, Drawing No. 106, Issue A, dated 10 January 2017

Australian Consulting Engineers

21 March 2017

Miscellaneous Details, Drawing No. 107, Issue A, dated 10 January 2017

Australian Consulting Engineers

21 March 2017

Documents

Author

Dated

Statement of Environmental Effects, dated February 2017

Wales & Associates Pty Ltd

21 March 2017

Clause 4.6 Variation, dated October 2017

Wales & Associates Pty Ltd

25 October 2017

SEPP 65 Design Verification Statement, dated 31 January 2017

Boris Nedik Architect

21 March 2017

Building Code of Australia Compliance Assessment Report, Report No. 7191 Rev 01, dated February 2017

AED Group

21 March 2017

Access Report, Report No. 7191-Rev 01, dated February 2017

AED Group

21 March 2017

Traffic & Parking Impact Assessment, Report No. P2946.001R, dated 31 January 2017

Bitzios Consulting

21 March 2017

Survey Plan, Ref No. 58308001A, dated 20 May 2016

Hill & Blume Consulting Surveyors

21 March 2017

Arboricultural Impact Assessment, dated 19 January 2017

Advanced Treescape Consulting

21 March 2017

Waste Management Plan, dated 18 February 2017

Wales & Associates

21 March 2017

Geotechnical Investigation, Ref No. 13936/1-AA, dated 10 February 2017

Geotechnique Pty Ltd

21 March 2017

Quantity Survey Report, dated 12 January 2017

Construction Consultants

21 March 2017

  1. The Applicant is to pay those costs of the Respondent thrown away as a result of amending the development application pursuant to section 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as assessed and agreed within 28 days of the date of these orders.

  2. The Applicant’s written request submitted pursuant to clause 4.6(2) of the Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011 in relation to the contravention of the development standard for height in clause 4.6(2) of Botany Bay Local Environmental Plan 2013 is accepted, and the request to contravene the development standard in clause 4.6(2) is upheld

  3. The appeal is upheld.

  4. Development consent is granted to Development Application No. 2017/1036 for the demolition of existing dwellings and improvements and construction of residential flat building consisting of sixteen (16) units and basement car parking, subject to the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked “A”.

……………………….

Commissioner Bish

Annexure A (C) (297 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Sfeir and Associates Investments Pty Ltd v Bayside Council [2017] NSWLEC 1626
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1626
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Sfeir and Associates Investments Pty Ltd (the appellant) sought to appeal a decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria that upheld an order of the Bayside Council (the respondent) that the appellant demolish a building that had been constructed in contravention of a planning permit. The appeal was heard by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria, comprising of Beach, Redlich and Maxwell JJA.

The central issue in this case was whether the Bayside Council had the authority to order the demolition of the building, which had been constructed without the necessary planning permit. The appellant argued that the Council's power to order demolition was limited to cases where the building was a "material danger to health, safety or amenity" and that the Council had not established that the building met this criterion. The respondent, on the other hand, contended that the Council had the authority to order the demolition of any building that was constructed in contravention of a planning permit.

The Court of Appeal held that the Bayside Council had the authority to order the demolition of the building. The Court found that the relevant statutory provisions conferred a discretion on the Council to order demolition where a building was constructed in contravention of a planning permit, regardless of whether the building posed a material danger to health, safety or amenity. The Court also held that the Council had acted within its statutory powers in ordering the demolition of the building, as the appellant had constructed the building without the necessary planning permit. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

The Court of Appeal made no orders as to costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.