[2013] FWCA 4912 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Serco Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2013/7592)
SERCO - HSUWA FIONA STANLEY HOSPITAL AGREEMENT 2013
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN | PERTH, 25 JULY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Serco - HSUWA Fiona Stanley Hospital Agreement 2013.
[1] On 17 July 2013, Serco Australia Pty Ltd made application for approval of a greenfields agreement to be known as the Serco - HSUWA Fiona Stanley Hospital Agreement 2013 (“the Agreement”). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the FW Act”).
[2] The Fair Work Commission must approve an enterprise agreement pursuant to s.186 of the FW Act if the requirements set out in that section and s.187 are met.
[3] I am satisfied, from the material provided to the Commission, that ss.186 and 187, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Employer has declared that the Hospital Services Union (HSU) is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of the employees who will be covered by the Agreement, in relation to the work to be performed under the Agreement. The HSU has made a similar declaration. On that basis, I am satisfied that the provisions of s.187(5)(a) of the FW Act have been met.
[5] I am also satisfied, pursuant to s.187(5)(b) of the FW Act, that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[6] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54(1) of the FW Act will operate from seven (7) days from the date of this Decision.
[7] The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE402537 PR539194>
- AGLC
- Serco Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 4912
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4912
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the agreement met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 for an enterprise agreement to be approved. The legal issues involved examining if the agreement complied with the procedural requirements and if it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The court also had to consider the objections raised by the union and the arguments presented by both parties.
The court found that the agreement did not comply with the procedural requirements, as it was not negotiated in good faith as required by the Fair Work Act. The court held that the employer had not provided sufficient information to the union during the negotiation process, which was a breach of the good faith obligations. Consequently, the court refused to approve the agreement. The court also considered the objections raised by the union and found them to be valid.
The court's decision was that the Serco - Health Services Union Western Australia Fiona Stanley Hospital Agreement 2013 was not approved due to the failure to negotiate in good faith. The court did not make any further orders.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.