Serbastion Engler v Unitronix Pty Ltd

[2021] FWC 6222

[2021] FWC 6222

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal

Serbastion Engler
v
Unitronix Pty Ltd
(U2021/8941)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT MELBOURNE, 28 OCTOBER 2021

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy

[1] On 6 October 2021 Mr Serbastion Engler made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act). Mr Engler alleged he was unfairly dismissed by Unitronix Pty Ltd (the Respondent) on 16 September 2021.

[2] The application was incomplete in that Mr Engler did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.

[3] On 12 October 2021 the Commission attempted to contact Mr Engler on his nominated telephone number to discuss payment of the required fee however, Mr Engler did not answer the call. A short voicemail message converted to text was left, requesting him to return the call.

[4] Later that day, the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Engler’s nominated email address advising that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment was not made or a waiver form was not received within 14 days, the application may be dismissed.

[5] A final attempt to contact Mr Engler was made by the Commission on 25 October 2021 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered and there was no option to leave a voicemail.

[6] To date there has been no response from Mr Engler, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.

[7] Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:

395 Application fees

(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

(2) The regulations may prescribe:

(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

(b) a method for indexing the fee; and

(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.

[8] Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

[9] Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act. An order 1 to this effect will be issued with this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR735303>

 1   PR735304.