FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| SELLERS & APPLEBY (NO. 2) | [2017] FamCA 1142 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Contravention – where the mother admits she has not complied with final orders – where the mother submitted that she had a reasonable excuse for her conduct as that conduct was necessary to protect the health and safety of the children – finding that the mother does not have a reasonable excuse for contravening final orders – order that the mother enter into a bond for 12 months. |
FAMILY LAW – COSTS – order that the mother pay the father’s costs – order that such costs to be as agreed between the parties and failing agreement to be taxed.
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 70NAC, 70NAE, 70NEA, 70NEB, 70NEC, 117 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) r 21.08 |
| Gaunt & Gaunt (1978) FLC 90-468 |
| APPLICANT: | Mr Sellers |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Appleby |
| FILE NUMBER: | MLC | 1090 | of | 2015 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 18 December 2017 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Melbourne |
| PLACE HEARD: | Melbourne |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Johns J |
| HEARING DATE: | 12 December 2017 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Ms Matson |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Peter Baker & Associates |
| THE RESPONDENT: | In Person |
Orders
That upon having found the respondent mother to have contravened Order 3 of the Orders dated 18 October 2017, such contravention found to be within Subdivision E of Division 13A of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), within 14 days the mother enter into a bond for a period of 12 months conditional upon complying with all orders of the Court in the meantime.
That subject to the bond being entered into, the Application – Contravention filed 23 November 2017 is otherwise dismissed.
That the mother pay the father’s costs of and incidental to the Application – Contravention filed 23 November 2017, such costs to be agreed and failing agreement to be assessed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Sellers & Appleby (No. 2) has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT |
FILE NUMBER: MLC 1090 of 2015
| Mr Sellers |
Applicant
And
| Ms Appleby |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
On 18 October 2017 final orders (“the final Orders”) were made by Cronin J in respect of the parenting arrangements for the children C, aged 6 years, and D aged 5 years. Those orders were made following a four-day contested hearing before Cronin J between 18 and 21 September 2017. Both the mother and the father were represented at the final hearing and the interests of the children were…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Sellers and Appleby (No. 2) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] FamCA 1142
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the mother had contravened Order 3 of the existing orders, and if so, whether such contravention fell within the scope of Subdivision E of Division 13A of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). This subdivision deals with contravention of parenting orders.
Johns J found that the mother had indeed contravened Order 3. The court reasoned that the mother's actions constituted a contravention within the meaning of the Act. Consequently, the court ordered the mother to enter into a bond for a period of 12 months, conditional upon her compliance with all future court orders.
Subject to the mother entering into the specified bond, the father's application alleging contravention was otherwise dismissed. The mother was also ordered to pay the father's costs associated with the contravention application.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That upon having found the respondent mother to have contravened Order 3 of the Orders dated 18 October 2017, such contravention found to be within Subdivision E of Division 13A of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), within 14 days the mother enter into a bond for a period of 12 months conditional upon complying with all orders of the Court in the meantime.
2.
That subject to the bond being entered into, the Application – Contravention filed 23 November 2017 is otherwise dismissed.
3.
That the mother pay the father’s costs of and incidental to the Application – Contravention filed 23 November 2017, such costs to be agreed and failing agreement to be assessed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.