Secretary, Department of Justice and Community Safety Applicant v B.R. Respondent

Case

[2020] VCC 2095

16 July 2020

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA

AT MELBOURNE

CRIMINAL DIVISION

Revised
Not Restricted
Suitable for Publication

Case No. CR-17-01232

Secretary, Department of Justice and Community Safety Applicant
v
B.R. Respondent

---

JUDGE:

Her Honour Judge Cannon

WHERE HELD:

Melbourne

DATE OF HEARING:

16 July 2020

DATE OF JUDGMENT:

16 July 2020

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

Secretary DJCS and B.R.

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2020 VCC 2095

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
---

Subject:CRIMINAL LAW

Catchwords:              Review Supervision Order – Unacceptable risk of committing further offences

Legislation Cited:      Serious Offenders Act 2018 (Vic)

Judgment:                  Supervision Order confirmed

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Applicant Ms A. Roodenburg VGSO
For the Respondent Ms J. Kennedy VLA

HER HONOUR:

1This is a review of a supervision order which had previously been made pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Serious Offenders Act 2018, which I have referred to as 'the Act' from time to time. In respect of the respondent, the supervision order, or 'the order', which I might refer to it from time to time, was made on 27 February 2018 for a period of four years. I must revoke the order unless I am satisfied that the respondent still poses an unacceptable risk of a serious sex offence, serious violent offence or both in the community and if he is in the community, and if not subject to a supervision order.

2Having considered the material relied on in this matter, that is the progress report prepared by Mr Simon Candlish dated 16 December 2019, and having had regard to the respondent's antecedents, having considered the submissions of the parties who are in agreement in respect of this issue, I am satisfied that the respondent still poses an unacceptable risk of committing a serious sexual offence if not subject to a supervision order and in the community.

3Further, I am satisfied that the conditions in the draft supervision order, previously provided to me and dated 8 May 2020, are appropriate in view of the primary purpose of the condition, and in view of the relevant requirements as set out in s.27 of the Act.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1