Second Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 3 April 2017

SECOND AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 3 APRIL 2017

AMENDED LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention by Video-Link
Phillip Maxwell Jones

For Mention
Paul Arnold Every
DJK

For Bail Consent
Lewan Patrick Lehman
Darren James Barwick

For Trial
Kelly Raema Mundy Page
Michelle Lee Arnott
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:45 a.m.
For Mention
WLNH

For Trial
David John Charles King
(Part Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Further Submissions/Sentence by Video Link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Benjamin Robert Joseph

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearings via video-link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Kurt Von Stalheim
v
The Anti-Discrimination Tribunal

Kurt Von Stalheim
v
The Anti-Discrimination Tribunal and Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Submissions as to Orders
Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited
v
Her Majesty’s Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Senior Sergeant John Parker
v
Christopher Mark Shaw

3:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via Telephone
Anthony John (Jon) Wheaton
v
Constable Annette Wilson and Constable Peter McKenna

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Strike out Statement of Claim
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
v
Shane Gill

2:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Chamer Pty Ltd and anor
v
Caltas Pty Ltd and anor

LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Civil Jurisdiction

In Court as in Chambers

4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Kurt Von Stalheim v The Anti-Discrimination Tribunal
Kurt Von Stalheim v The Anti-Discrimination Tribunal & Anor.

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
Daniel Mark Delphine
Adam Maxwell Cox

To Follow
For Directions Hearing by Video Link
Nathan Henry John Riley
Sean Gregory Richardson
Matthew Luke Williams
Christopher John Humphreys

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Ricky Lee Smith-Towns
Malcolm Joshua Mayne
Carly Ann Dekkers

10:30am For Trial
SG

4:00pm For Bail Application
Andrew Rex Gleeson

4:15pm For Further Submissions/ Sentence by Video Link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Benjamin Robert Joseph

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The Supreme Court of Tasmania issued its Second Amended Law Lists for Monday, 3 April 2017, detailing various criminal and civil cases scheduled for hearing across different courts in Hobart and Launceston. The list includes cases ranging from mentions, bail applications, trials, and directions hearings. Among the cases listed, notable mentions include Phillip Maxwell Jones, who had a case for mention by video-link, and Kelly Raema Mundy Page who was scheduled for trial. Additionally, Kurt Von Stalheim was involved in two cases against the Anti-Discrimination Tribunal and Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, both of which were listed for submissions as to orders.

The legal issues before the court involved a variety of matters, including criminal proceedings such as mentions, bail applications, and trials, as well as civil matters that ranged from directions hearings to submissions as to orders. The court was tasked with managing the logistics of video-link hearings, ensuring timely proceedings, and addressing the legal submissions and applications from both criminal and civil cases.

The court’s reasoning and outcome, as evidenced by the listed cases, involved ensuring that all parties received due process, managing the scheduling of video-link hearings, and proceeding with the hearing of applications and trials as scheduled. The court facilitated the efficient administration of justice by accommodating video-link technology for hearings, allowing remote participation where necessary. The final orders would depend on the outcomes of the individual cases as they proceeded through the court system.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established