Secom Australia Pty Ltd

Case

[2016] FWCA 193

11 JANUARY 2016

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2016] FWCA 193
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

FURTHER DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.602 – Application to correct or amend

Secom Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2014/7612)

SECOM SECURITY AUSTRALIA - EMPLOYEE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2017

Security services

COMMISSIONER GREGORY

MELBOURNE, 11 JANUARY 2016

Application to amend the original agreement approved in the matter of the Secom Security Australia - Employee Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017.

[1] This decision deals with an application by Secom Australia Pty Ltd (“Secom Australia”) under s.602 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (“the Act”) seeking amendments to correct errors in the Secom Security Australia - Employee Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017.

[2] The Agreement was approved with undertakings on 24 December 2014. That decision was then the subject of an appeal by United Voice, however, the appeal was dismissed on 18 March 2015. The hearing in this matter was accordingly deferred until such time as the Full Bench had determined the appeal.

[3] The present application was heard on 8 May 2015. Mr Tim McDonald from Moray and Agnew appeared on behalf of Secom Australia, together with Secom’s HR Manager, Mr Sam Gillani. Mr Stefan Russell-Uren appeared on behalf of United Voice. The Union opposed the application at the time but has subsequently advised that it does not now persist with its opposition to the application.

[4] The Applicant also provided a statement signed by Mr Gillani containing an explanation about why the Agreement contained errors in regard to the applicable public holiday penalty rate and the Level 3 Full Time/Part Time Day rate (Monday to Friday).

[5] Section 602 of the Act states:

    “602 Correcting obvious errors etc. in relation to the FWC’s decisions

    (1) The FWC may correct or amend any obvious error, defect or irregularity (whether in substance or form) in relation to a decision of the FWC (other than an error, defect or irregularity in a modern award or national minimum wage order).

    Note 1: If the FWC makes a decision to make an instrument, the FWC may correct etc. the instrument under this section (see subsection 598(2)).

    Note 2: The FWC corrects modern awards and national minimum wage orders under sections 160 and 296.

    (1) The FWC may correct or amend the error, defect or irregularity:

      (a) on its own initiative; or

      (b) on application.” 1

[6] Section 598(2) of the Act states:

    “(2) If the FWC makes a decision that makes or varies an instrument, a reference in this Part to a decision of the FWC includes the FWC’s decision to make or vary the instrument in the particular terms decided.” 2

[7] Secom submits in its F1 application:

    “The Applicant seeks the following amendments to correct errors in the Secom Security Australia Employee Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017 [AE411989] (Agreement), approved on 24 December 2014:

  • Amendment 1


  • Clause 3.2.1 Rates of Pay, the rate for ‘Secom Level 3’ FULL TIME/PART TIME DAY RATE (Monday to Friday) is incorrect- amend ‘$20.21’ to read ‘$20.41’; and

  • Amendment 2


  • Clause 5.6.1 Payment for work on a public holiday- the penalty rate for working on a public holiday is incorrectly expressed- amend ‘250%’ to read ‘150%’ (being a total rate of pay equal to double time and a half).

    2. Specifically, the Applicant seeks the following orders:

    A. The Agreement is varied by deleting the amount ‘$20.21’ appearing in clause 3.2.1 and inserting ‘$20.41’.

    B. The Agreement is varied by deleting the percentage amount ‘250%’ appearing in clause 5.6.1 and inserting ‘150%’.” 3

[8] The Full Bench determined in the matter of Fair Work Australia v Schweppes Australia Pty Ltd & Anor 4 :

    “…the power under s.602 is not confined to errors made by the Tribunal but could extend to obvious errors made by the parties reflected in instruments the Tribunal makes.” 5

[9] I am accordingly satisfied that the Commission has the power to amend the Agreement under s.602 of the Act in the manner proposed in the present application. After considering the views of the parties in this matter, as well as the nature of the proposed changes, I am therefore prepared to make an order amending the Agreement as proposed by the Applicant.

[10] An order to this effect will be issued in conjunction with this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Appearances:

Tim McDonald from Moray and Agnew appeared on behalf of Secom Australia.

Mr Stefan Russell-Uren appeared on behalf of United Voice.

Hearing details:

2015.

Melbourne; Sydney; Canberra (by video):

8 May.

 1   Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) at s.602

 2 Ibid at s.598(2)

 3 F1 application signed 3 February 2015 at 2.1

 4   [2012] FWAFB 7858

 5   Ibid at [348]

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE411989  PR576007>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

2

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0