Secco and Reid (No.2)
Case
•
[2019] FCCA 2594
•20 September 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Secco and Reid (No.2) [2019] FCCA 2594
[2019] FCCA 2594
20 September 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Secco and Reid (No.2)*, the applicant sought costs from the respondent following earlier proceedings. The dispute concerned the quantum of costs to be awarded. The matter came before Judge Tonkin.
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate quantum of costs to be paid by the respondent to the applicant, and to consider the costs of the costs application itself.
Judge Tonkin ordered that the respondent pay the applicant's costs in the sum of $32,498.75 within 90 days. However, with respect to the costs of the costs application, each party was ordered to bear their own costs.
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate quantum of costs to be paid by the respondent to the applicant, and to consider the costs of the costs application itself.
Judge Tonkin ordered that the respondent pay the applicant's costs in the sum of $32,498.75 within 90 days. However, with respect to the costs of the costs application, each party was ordered to bear their own costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Secco and Reid (No.2) [2019] FCCA 2594
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
15
Statutory Material Cited
2
Tamaniego and Tamaniego (Costs)
[2011] FamCAFC 30
Fitzgerald (as child representative for A (Legal Aid Commission of Tasmania)) v Fish and Another
[2005] FamCA 158
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4