Searle (Formerly Pencious) & Pencious And Anor
Case
•
[2013] FamCA 375
•28 May 2013.
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Searle (Formerly Pencious) & Pencious [2013] FamCA 375
[2013] FamCA 375
28 May 2013.
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Searle (Formerly Pencious) & Pencious And Anor, Benjamin J made orders concerning the financial and property settlement between the parties. The dispute involved the division of assets and liabilities, including a significant sum of money, a motor vehicle, and various other property and superannuation entitlements. The court also addressed the issue of indemnification for a specific debt.
The court was required to determine the final distribution of property and the allocation of financial responsibilities between the parties. This included deciding the quantum of a payment to be made by the wife to the husband, the transfer of a vehicle, and the extent to which each party would retain their existing property and superannuation. Furthermore, the court considered the implications of outstanding costs orders and the procedure for their resolution.
Benjamin J ordered the wife to pay the husband a sum of $346,720 within ninety days, and to transfer a Mercedes sedan to the wife. The husband was ordered to indemnify the wife against a Citibank Savings liability. Each party was to retain all other property and superannuation in their possession, with specific deeming provisions for bank accounts, insurance policies, and superannuation entitlements. The court also made provision for the wife to apply to deduct outstanding costs orders from the payment due to the husband, and for all other outstanding applications to be dismissed.
The court was required to determine the final distribution of property and the allocation of financial responsibilities between the parties. This included deciding the quantum of a payment to be made by the wife to the husband, the transfer of a vehicle, and the extent to which each party would retain their existing property and superannuation. Furthermore, the court considered the implications of outstanding costs orders and the procedure for their resolution.
Benjamin J ordered the wife to pay the husband a sum of $346,720 within ninety days, and to transfer a Mercedes sedan to the wife. The husband was ordered to indemnify the wife against a Citibank Savings liability. Each party was to retain all other property and superannuation in their possession, with specific deeming provisions for bank accounts, insurance policies, and superannuation entitlements. The court also made provision for the wife to apply to deduct outstanding costs orders from the payment due to the husband, and for all other outstanding applications to be dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Remedies
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
PENCIOUS & SEARLE [2016] FamCAFC 27
Cases Citing This Decision
3
Searle & Pencious
[2016] FamCA 135
Pencious & Searle
[2017] FamCAFC 210
PENCIOUS & SEARLE
[2016] FamCAFC 27
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
0
Stanford v Stanford
[2012] HCA 52
Hickey & Hickey
[2003] FamCA 395
Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Buckle
[1998] HCA 4