SCVG v KLD

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

SCVG

v

KLD & ANOR

[2017] HCASL 225
S171/2017

  1. The proposed appeal would not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal.  Special leave should be refused. 

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

V.M. Bell
14 September 2017
S.J. Gageler
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read SCVG v KLD and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] HCASL 225
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal was brought by the appellant, SCVG, against the respondents KLD and ANOR. The dispute arose from a decision of the South Australian Supreme Court. The nature of the dispute involved the granting of an interlocutory injunction, and SCVG sought to appeal this decision to the High Court.

The legal issues that the court had to decide included whether the appeal had sufficient prospects of success and whether special leave to appeal should be granted. The court also had to determine whether the appeal was an appropriate case for special leave to be granted.

The court found that the appeal did not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The court was of the view that the appeal would not succeed and that the decision of the South Australian Supreme Court should be upheld. The court noted that the interlocutory injunction was granted in the circumstances of the case, and the respondents had acted in accordance with the law. The court also found that the appeal did not raise any significant legal issues that warranted special leave to be granted.

Pursuant to rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), the court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The court refused to grant special leave to appeal, and the appeal was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.