SCVG
v
KLD & ANOR
[2017] HCASL 225
S171/2017
The proposed appeal would not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. Special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
V.M. Bell
14 September 2017S.J. Gageler
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read SCVG v KLD and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] HCASL 225
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to decide included whether the appeal had sufficient prospects of success and whether special leave to appeal should be granted. The court also had to determine whether the appeal was an appropriate case for special leave to be granted.
The court found that the appeal did not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The court was of the view that the appeal would not succeed and that the decision of the South Australian Supreme Court should be upheld. The court noted that the interlocutory injunction was granted in the circumstances of the case, and the respondents had acted in accordance with the law. The court also found that the appeal did not raise any significant legal issues that warranted special leave to be granted.
Pursuant to rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), the court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The court refused to grant special leave to appeal, and the appeal was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.