Scully v Roberts

Case [2003] WADC 42


SCULLY -v- ROBERTS [2003] WADC 42
Last Update:  17/03/2003
SCULLY -v- ROBERTS [2003] WADC 42
Jurisdiction: DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   Citation No: [2003] WADC 42
Case No: CIV:706/2000   Heard: 16 JULY, 30 OCTOBER & 12 NOVEMBER 2001, 18 & 19 NOVEMBER 2002
Coram: VIOL DCJ   Delivered: 05/03/2003
Location: PERTH   Supplementary Decision:
No of Pages: 27   Judgment Part: 1 of 1
Result: Total award $180,875.93, including general damages award of $30,700
[Click here for Judgment in Adobe Acrobat Format ]
Parties: TERRANCE JOHN SCULLY
RONALD ROBERTS

Catchwords: Motor vehicle Assessment of damages Injuries to cervical spine and other areas Claims of loss of earning capacity, both past and future Whether work accident affected work capacity Turns on own facts
Legislation: Motor Vehicle (Third Party Insurance) Act 1943 (as amended)

Case References: Nil

Nil

JURISDICTION : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

                  IN CIVIL
LOCATION : PERTH CITATION : SCULLY -v- ROBERTS [2003] WADC 42 CORAM : VIOL DCJ HEARD : 16 JULY, 30 OCTOBER & 12 NOVEMBER 2001, 18 & 19 NOVEMBER 2002 DELIVERED : 5 MARCH 2003 FILE NO/S : CIV 706 of 2000 BETWEEN : TERRANCE JOHN SCULLY
                  Plaintiff

                  AND

                  RONALD ROBERTS
                  Defendant




Catchwords:

Motor vehicle - Assessment of damages - Injuries to cervical spine and other areas - Claims of loss of earning capacity, both past and future - Whether work accident affected work capacity - Turns on own facts


Legislation:

Motor Vehicle (Third Party Insurance) Act 1943 (as amended)


Result:

Total award $180,875.93, including general damages award of $30,700


(Page 2)

Representation:

Counsel:


    Plaintiff : Mr R J Butcher
    Defendant : Mr J G Staude


Solicitors:

    Plaintiff : Butcher Paull & Calder
    Defendant : John G Staude


Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Nil

Case(s) also cited:

Nil



(Page 3)

1 VIOL DCJ: The plaintiff, who is now aged 50 years old, was born on 24 April 1952.

2 The plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident on 12 June 1998 ("the motor vehicle accident"). The defendant has admitted liability for such accident. The plaintiff alleges that, as a result of the accident, he sustained the following injuries:

      1. An injury to the left ear resulting in hyperacusis;

      2. An injury to the neck and cervical spine;

      3. Consequential to his injuries, depression and anxiety; and

      4. Horner's syndrome of the left eye.

3 As a result of the accident, it is said by the plaintiff that he attended a number of medical practitioners and has suffered a number of continuing and permanent disabilities. These are pleaded in par 4 of the statement of claim ie.:
          "(a) Hearing loss and noise intolerance;

          (b) Loss of balance;

          (c) Jaw pain;

          (d) Neck pain;

          (e) Restricted neck movement;

          (f) Weakness of the left arm;

          (g) Nausea;

          (h) Disturbed sleep;

          (i) Difficulty sitting, standing or sustaining physical activity for long periods;

          (j) A need to take medications;

          (k) Frustration and anxiety; and

          (l) Blurred vision in the left eye."

4 It is said by the plaintiff that, at the…

Continue reading Scully v Roberts

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Scully v ROBERTS [2003] WADC 42
Case
[2003] WADC 42
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Scully v Roberts involved an action by the plaintiff against the defendant for damages resulting from a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff, who had been injured in the accident, sought compensation for both past and future loss of earning capacity, among other damages. The dispute centred on the extent to which the plaintiff's work capacity had been impacted by the injuries sustained in the accident. The court was tasked with assessing the total amount of damages that should be awarded to the plaintiff, considering the injuries to the cervical spine and other areas, and the implications for the plaintiff's ability to work.

The primary legal issues before the court were the quantification of the plaintiff's damages and the determination of the extent to which the motor vehicle accident had contributed to the plaintiff's loss of earning capacity. The court had to consider expert medical evidence and vocational assessments to evaluate the impact of the injuries on the plaintiff's ability to work and earn income. The court also needed to assess the extent to which the injuries had a permanent impact on the plaintiff's future earning capacity.

In delivering its judgment, the court carefully reviewed the evidence presented, including the medical reports and vocational assessments. The court found that the plaintiff had sustained significant injuries which impacted his ability to work, both in the past and likely in the future. The court determined that the total award for damages should reflect the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and their impact on his earning capacity. The court concluded that the appropriate total award was $180,875.93, which included a general damages award of $30,700. This award recognised the physical and psychological impact of the injuries on the plaintiff, as well as the financial losses incurred as a result of the accident.

Orders

Orders of the court

Total award $180,875.93, including general damages award of $30,700

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.