FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 1)
Scott & Munayallan (No. 2) [2021] FedCFamC1F 112
File number(s): SYC 59 of 2010 Judgment of: HENDERSON J Date of judgment: 29 September 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW - INJUNCTIONS – Interim application made by the wife for injunctions and other procedural orders including the joining of parties – Where the husband failed to attend the hearing – Protection of wife’s interest in matrimonial assets – Application granted Division: Division 1 First Instance Number of paragraphs: 25 Date of hearing: 29 September 2021 Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Duc Solicitor for the Applicant: Mills Oakley Lawyers The Respondent: No appearance ORDERS
SYC 59 of 2010 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)
BETWEEN: MS MUNAYALLAN
Applicant
AND: MR SCOTT
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
HENDERSON J
DATE OF ORDER:
29 SEPTEMBER 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
- Leave be granted to the parties to receive electronic copies of all documents produced on subpoena to LL Medical Centre and EE Hospital.
- The Court will resume for submissions on the issue of costs and the wife’s application for a lump sum payment at 10am tomorrow, 30 September 2021.
- An order joining I Pty Ltd ACN …, DD Pty Ltd ACN …, CC Pty Ltd ACN … and Ms Scott as parties to the proceedings
- This matter is stood over to 10am on Thursday 7 October 2021 for part-heard final hearing and for the joined parties specified in orders 5 and 3 to attend Court via Microsoft Teams. If an earlier date is required the Court will accommodate that if at all possible by a party contacting my Associate to arrange an earlier listing date .
- The husband is ordered to attend Court via Microsoft Teams at 10am on 7 October 2021 and in the event he fails to attend on that occasion the Court will entertain an application to issue an arrest warrant.
- Ms HH and Mr M, pursuant to subpoena, are ordered to attend Court via Microsoft Teams at 10am on 7 October 2021 to give evidence in these proceedings and in the event they fail to attend on that occasion the Court will entertain an application to issue an arrest warrant.
7.The service of any orders on Mr M be affected by serving same by email to ... or as specified in these orders.
8.The wife serve the husband with a copy of these Orders by email as soon as possible after Court concludes today.
9.The service of these orders on Ms Scott to be effected by emailing her a copy of these Orders to the email address provided by the Respondent pursuant to these Orders.
10.The husband provide to the wife’s solicitor by email to … by 5pm on 29 September 2021 the email addresses, residential addresses and phone numbers of Ms Scott, Ms L, Mr L, Mr M and Mr K Scott.
11.The wife may issue subpoena to Ms Scott, Ms L and Mr L to attend Court via…
Continue reading Scott & Munayallan (No. 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Scott & Munayallan (No. 2) [2021] FedCFamC1F 112
- Case
- [2021] FedCFamC1F 112
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the husband had failed to attend the hearing despite being ordered to do so. Additionally, the court was concerned about the husband's health after receiving a medical certificate that was later found to have been altered. The court noted that the husband had attended a medical centre and obtained a new medical certificate that extended his unfitness to attend court until 1 October 2021. The court granted the wife's application for procedural orders and issued injunctions to restrain the sale, transfer, or other dealings in relation to certain property and to freeze bank accounts of the husband and other related entities. The court also ordered the husband to provide contact details of certain individuals and allowed the wife to issue further subpoenas for documents and attendance at the hearing. The final hearing is scheduled for 7 October 2021.
The court granted the wife's application for procedural orders and issued injunctions to protect her interest in matrimonial assets. The court also noted the husband's failure to attend the hearing and the possible tampering with a medical certificate. The final hearing is scheduled for 7 October 2021.
Orders
Orders of the court
SYC 59 of 2010
FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)
BETWEEN:
MS MUNAYALLAN
Applicant
AND:
MR SCOTT
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
HENDERSON J
DATE OF ORDER:
29 SEPTEMBER 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave be granted to the parties to receive electronic copies of all documents produced on subpoena to LL Medical Centre and EE Hospital.
2. The Court will resume for submissions on the issue of costs and the wife’s application for a lump sum payment at 10am tomorrow, 30 September 2021.
3. An order joining I Pty Ltd ACN …, DD Pty Ltd ACN …, CC Pty Ltd ACN … and Ms Scott as parties to the proceedings
4. This matter is stood over to 10am on Thursday 7 October 2021 for part-heard final hearing and for the joined parties specified in orders 5 and 3 to attend Court via Microsoft Teams. If an earlier date is required the Court will accommodate that if at all possible by a party contacting my Associate to arrange an earlier listing date .
5. The husband is ordered to attend Court via Microsoft Teams at 10am on 7 October 2021 and in the event he fails to attend on that occasion the Court will entertain an application to issue an arrest warrant.
6. Ms HH and Mr M, pursuant to subpoena, are ordered to attend Court via Microsoft Teams at 10am on 7 October 2021 to give evidence in these proceedings and in the event they fail to attend on that occasion the Court will entertain an application to issue an arrest warrant.
7. The service of any orders on Mr M be affected by serving same by email to ... or as specified in these orders.
8. The wife serve the husband with a copy of these Orders by email as soon as possible after Court concludes today.
9. The service of these orders on Ms Scott to be effected by emailing her a copy of these Orders to the email address provided by the Respondent pursuant to these Orders.
10. The husband provide to the wife’s solicitor by email to … by 5pm on 29 September 2021 the email addresses, residential addresses and phone numbers of Ms Scott, Ms L, Mr L, Mr M and Mr K Scott.
11. The wife may issue subpoena to Ms Scott, Ms L and Mr L to attend Court via Microsoft Teams to give evidence on 7 October 2021 and service of such Subpoena to be effected by forwarding a copy of the subpoena to the named recipient’s email address as provided by the Respondent pursuant to these orders with the conduct money for those subpoena to be paid by the husband Mr Scott.
12. In the event the husband fails to provide the email address of the above named, the Court may consider service has been effected upon Ms Scott, Ms L and Mr L and Mr M by those subpoena being served upon the husband with a request to him to on forward those subpoena to the named recipients.
13. Leave granted to the wife to file and serve as many further subpoenas for the production of documents and/or attendance at the hearing that she deems appropriate and the Court requests the Registry consider waiving the payment of court filing fees due to the indigency of the wife, with such subpoenas to be returnable by 4pm on any day the wife selects commencing 30 September 2021.
14. The husband and all other parties joined to these proceedings pursuant to Orders herein be hereby restrained by injunction from:
a. the sale, transfer or other dealing in relation to F Street, Suburb MM in the State of New South Wales and described as Folio Identifier … (“the Suburb MM property”); and
b. further encumbering the Suburb MM property.
15. The wife file and serve an undertaking as to damages in relation to the injunctions Ordered herein, within 24 hours.
16. The wife be permitted to lodge a Request at the NSW Land Registry Services in respect of the Suburb MM property for the purpose of registering a sealed copy of these orders on title, pending further order.
17. The service of these orders on the entities joined to these proceedings be effected by emailing ..., namely the entities which have been joined to these proceedings pursuant to Orders herein.
18. An order freezing all bank accounts held by DD Pty Ltd, I Pty Ltd and CC Pty Ltd, or otherwise restraining the husband, Mr Scott, or such entities of which he has control or an interest in from depleting or withdrawing any sums or monies in their respective accounts, subject to any Order of this Court.
19. Any account held in the name of Ms Scott be frozen up to an amount of $1,300,000, otherwise she is free to deal with her accounts in the normal course.
20. The Court will entertain any application to remove the restraints pursuant to these Orders when such application is filed by any party such affected, supported by an application in a case and affidavit, to be heard by the Court as presently constituted if the restraint is sought to be lifted.
21. Any party who has been joined to these proceedings and is restrained from dealing with monies held in various bank accounts may approach the Court in Chambers to have the matter relisted at an earlier date should they so desire.
AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:
1. The husband has failed to attend this hearing via Microsoft Teams on Monday and Wednesday of this week.
2. Ms HH and Mr M were ordered to attend Court pursuant to a subpoena to give evidence today, 29 September 2021, in these proceedings and have failed to appear. The Court is satisfied that they have been served in accordance with the Rules.
3. There is clear evidence that the husband, Mr Scott, may have altered a medical certificate of the LL Medical Centre dated 27 September 2021 and that issue will be addressed at the final hearing which is to recommence at 10am on 7 October 2021.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
In those circumstances, I adjourned the proceedings to allow appropriate medical reports to be obtained, namely reports and his records from the LL Medical Centre, a Dr FF, who authored a medical certificate he forwarded to the Court dated 27 September 2021 wherein it said:THIS IS TO CERTIFY THATMr Scott has a medical condition and will be unfit for Court Appearance, Preparation, Work from 27/09/2021 to 30/09/2021 inclusive.(Emphasis in original) Further, to obtain records from EE Hospital where Mr Scott said he admitted himself on Sunday due to his concerns about a heart attack and reaction to a COVID vaccine and, from his own lips, to obtain information from his general practitioner at BB Medical Centre. The solicitors of the wife have worked tirelessly, probably 23 hours in 24, to ensure that the relevant subpoenas, requests for information, correspondence, telephone contacts have been made both with EE Hospital, the LL Medical Centre and, in particular, Dr FF and the general practitioner Mr Scott said was his general practitioner. Today, Wednesday, 29 September, the matter resumed to allow this information to be brought to the Court, as the Court was concerned that Mr Scott may have been seriously unwell. Unfortunately, what has happened is that it has become apparent that the medical certificate Mr Scott forwarded to the Court on 27 September 2021 from Dr FF was not the medical certificate that she authored and that became apparent from the documents produced by that medical centre pursuant to subpoena and tendered in court today. The medical certificate that Dr FF produced and is in the records is as follows:THIS IS TO CERTIFY THATMr Scott has a medical condition and will be unfit for Work from 27/09/2021 to 30/09/2021 inclusive.(Emphasis in original) The words “court appearance” underlined, “preparation” underlined and the underlining in the word “work” appear to have been added to the medical certificate produced by Mr Scott on Monday, and this addition was noted by Dr FF in notes of the wife’s lawyers of a conversation with Dr FF. Further, Mr Scott had again attended the LL Medical Centre on 29 September 2021 and obtained a further medical certificate from yet another doctor, certainly not Dr FF, namely a Dr GG, which says:Mr Scott has a medical condition, will be unfit for Work and will be unable to attend court from 27/09/2021 to 1/10/2021 inclusive. (Emphasis in original)Extending the time in his previous medical certificate until this Friday. There are significant issues for Mr Scott to answer in relation to the apparent tampering of a medical certificate produced by a medical practitioner. The notes from EE Hospital were produced, and they have been exhibited in the Court and read by me, and I will mark the LL Medical Centre documents wife’s exhibit 1 and the EE Hospital documents wife’s exhibit 2. From the EE Hospital documents, it is clear Mr Scott certainly admitted himself to the hospital on Sunday evening complaining of dizziness, palpitations, pain in his left side, breathlessness, difficulty breathing and was concerned for his health. He noted or told the registrar at the hospital that he had had a similar reaction to a COVID vaccination he had a mere three weeks ago and one wonders, in circumstances where Mr Scott said he had an adverse reaction to a COVID vaccination, he would have had another one within a mere three weeks the Friday before a final hearing was to commence on the following Monday. However that answer will be for another date.