FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 1)
Scott & Munayallan (No 14) [2023] FedCFamC1F 772
File number(s): SYC 59 of 2010 Judgment of: ALDRIDGE J Date of judgment: 1 September 2023 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – INTERIM HEARING – Application seeking a review of a registrar’s order rejecting a prior application for filing and other orders – Where the appellant did not appear – Application dismissed. Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 198G, 471B Division: Division 1 First Instance Number of paragraphs: 13 Date of hearing: 1 September 2023 Place: Sydney The Applicant: No appearance The First Respondent: No appearance The Second Respondent: No appearance The Third Respondent: No appearance ORDERS
SYC 59 of 2010 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)
BETWEEN: MR MATTEN
Applicant
AND: MS SCOTT
First Respondent
MS MUNAYALLAN
Second Respondent
MR SCOTT (and another named in the Schedule)
Third Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
ALDRIDGE J
DATE OF ORDER:
1 SEPTEMBER 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The Application in a Proceeding filed on 22 August 2023 is dismissed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under a pseudonym has been approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
ALDRIDGE J:
This matter has been listed for hearing of Mr Matten’s application for a review of a registrar’s decision today at 2.30 pm. There is no appearance by any party notwithstanding the matter has been called outside the Court on three occasions.
The non-appearance of the applicant is a sufficient basis to dismiss the application. However, there are a number of further difficulties.
The application seeks to review a registrar’s decision rejecting an Application in a Proceeding Mr Matten sought to file on 21 August 2023. That application was filed in circumstances where Henderson J had published a number of judgments recently finally disposing of all the matters in issue at a trial level. Mr Matten has lodged two appeals against those decisions which were summarily dismissed this morning.
The application that was sought to be filed but was rejected, sought as Order 1(a) that the orders made by Henderson J on 11 August 2023 be stayed until Appeal No. NAA 217 of 2023 is heard. The appeal was dismissed this morning and there is no utility in the order.
Order 1(b) seeks for…
Continue reading Scott & Munayallan (No 14)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Scott & Munayallan (No 14) [2023] FedCFamC1F 772
- Case
- [2023] FedCFamC1F 772
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In considering the application, the court noted that Mr Matten did not appear at the interim hearing, which was a significant factor in its decision. The court emphasised the importance of parties appearing at hearings, particularly in family law matters where the interests of children and other family members are often at stake. Given Mr Matten's non-appearance, the court concluded that there were insufficient grounds to grant the application for a review of the registrar's order. The court further determined that the matter did not meet the criteria for an exception to the general rule that applications for leave to appeal must be heard by a judge.
Consequently, the court dismissed Mr Matten's application. The court's decision was based on the procedural requirement of appearance and the lack of a compelling reason to depart from the established practices of the court. The court's order, dated 1 September 2023, formally dismissed the application filed on 22 August 2023. The form of the order is subject to review as per the rules, ensuring accuracy and allowing for any necessary variations.
Orders
Orders of the court
SYC 59 of 2010
FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)
BETWEEN:
MR MATTEN
Applicant
AND:
MS SCOTT
First Respondent
MS MUNAYALLAN
Second Respondent
MR SCOTT (and another named in the Schedule)
Third Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
ALDRIDGE J
DATE OF ORDER:
1 SEPTEMBER 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Application in a Proceeding filed on 22 August 2023 is dismissed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.