Schweppes Australia Pty Ltd

Case

[2016] FWCA 5880

22 AUGUST 2016

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2016] FWCA 5880
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

Schweppes Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2016/4298)

SCHWEPPES AUSTRALIA ARCHERFIELD DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 22 AUGUST 2016

Application for termination of the Schweppes Australia Archerfield Distribution Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] Schweppes Australia Pty Ltd (Applicant) has applied, pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to terminate the Schweppes Australia Archerfield Distribution Enterprise Agreement 2013 (Agreement). The Agreement is expressed to cover the Applicant in respect to all Distribution employees employed at 376 Beatty Road, Archerfield QLD 4108 under the classifications set out in the Agreement and United Voice. The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date.

[1] Section 225 of the Act provides:

    225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

      If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

      (a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

      (b) an employee covered by the agreement;

      (c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.”

[2] Section 226 of the Act provides:

    226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

      If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

      (a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

      (b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

      (i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

      (ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

[3] United Voice is an organisation which is covered by the Agreement. In correspondence to my chambers of 18 August 2016, United Voice advised that it did not oppose the termination of the Agreement.

[4] Based on the material contained in the employer’s declaration filed with the application, I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. Taking into account all of the circumstances including those in s.226(b)(i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement. There is nothing before me which raises public interest considerations which might militate against termination of the Agreement. I am satisfied that it is appropriate to approve the termination of the Agreement, and I terminate the Agreement.

[5]
The termination will operate from 22 August 2016.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE403851  PR584458>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0