Schultz & anor v Bohringer
[2007] NSWLEC 560
•28 August 2007
Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Schultz & anor v Bohringer [2007] NSWLEC 560 PARTIES: APPLICANTS
RESPONDENT
Melissa Schultz & Jamie Skontouroglou
Gail BohringerFILE NUMBER(S): 20676 of 2007 CORAM: Moore C KEY ISSUES: Trees (Neighbours) - Neighbour Application :-
Consent ordersLEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 DATES OF HEARING: 28 August 2007 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 28 August 2007 LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANTS
RESPONDENT
In person
In person
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESMOORE C
28 August 2007
JUDGMENT07/20676 Melissa Schultz & Jamie Skontouroglou v Gail Bohringer
1 COMMISSIONER: This an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Act) to remove a Norfolk Island Pine (Araucaria heterophylla) (the tree) located on 44 Beryl Street, Coffs Harbour.
2 I have attended the site and had the opportunity of inspecting the tree from the applicants’ side of the fence.
3 During the course of the view, the parties reached agreement to share, equally, the cost of removal of the tree.
4 I inspected the damage which had been caused by a large root of the tree to the upper, non-structural element of the applicants’ retaining wall. The extent of the past damage is sufficient to enliven the Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to the first test posed by s 10(2)(a) of the Act.
5 I am also satisfied that it is prudent to give effect to the agreement between the parties that the tree be removed. Consent orders will be made to give effect to this agreement.
Tim Moore
Commissioner of the Court
0
0
1