Scholes v Department of Natural Resources and Water

Case

[2007] QLC 86

11 October 2007


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Scholes v Department of Natural Resources and Water [2007] QLC 0086
PARTIES: Edward Charles and Robin Margaret Scholes
(appellants)
v.
Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Water
(respondent)
FILE NO: AV2006/0019
DIVISION: Land Court of Queensland – General Division
PROCEEDINGS: An appeal against an interim valuation.
DELIVERED ON: 11 October 2007
DELIVERED AT: Blackall
MEMBER: Mr JJ Trickett, President
ORDER: The appeal is allowed, the unimproved valuation of the Chief Executive is set aside and the unimproved value of the subject land is determined at Five Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($550,000).
CATCHWORDS: Unimproved value – appeal against an interim valuation –relativity of the valuations - Valuation of Land Act 1944.
APPEARANCES: Mr A Boyd, Agent, for the appellants.
Mr W Isdale, of Counsel, Crown Law, for the respondent.
  1. This valuation was required to be made with the issue of a Permit to Occupy to the owners for grazing purposes, which has been amalgamated with the valuation of their property known as "Acacia Downs".

  2. The amalgamated property consists of 10,583.2595 hectares and has been valued by the respondent at $560,000, or $52.91 per hectare.  The appellants argue that the valuation should be reduced to $540,000, or $51 per hectare.  There is, therefore, very little between the parties. 

  3. After considering the written submissions and hearing from the representatives from both parties, it is my view that the valuation should be determined at $550,000. 

Order

The appeal is allowed, the unimproved valuation of the Chief Executive is set aside and the unimproved value of the subject land is determined at Five Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($550,000).

JJ TRICKETT

PRESIDENT OF THE LAND COURT

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0