| [2019] FWCA 2298 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2018/6337)
SCHINDLER LIFTS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD QUEENSLAND ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018 - 2021
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC | MELBOURNE, 5 APRIL 2019 |
Application for approval of the Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2018 - 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2018 - 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) & Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 5 April 2019 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 12 April 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 5 July 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE502744 PR706610>
- AGLC
- Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 2298
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 2298
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered the arguments presented by both parties, including the evidence regarding the bargaining process and the terms of the agreement. The employer argued that the agreement represented a fair and reasonable compromise between the parties, while the union contended that certain provisions of the agreement were not in the best interests of the employees. After careful consideration, the Commission determined that the agreement met the requirements for approval, finding that it provided for a fair and reasonable balance between the rights and interests of the parties and was made in good faith. The Commission also noted that the agreement provided for a number of improvements for the employees, including increased wages and better working conditions.
Based on its findings, the Commission approved the proposed enterprise agreement, which will now govern the terms and conditions of employment for the employees covered by the agreement. The decision serves as an important reminder of the importance of good faith bargaining and the need for enterprise agreements to provide for a fair and reasonable balance between the rights and interests of both employers and employees. The approval of the agreement will provide certainty and stability for the employees and the employer, and will help to promote productive and harmonious workplace relations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.