SBVD v MIAC & Anor

Case

[2007] HCATrans 789

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2007] HCATrans 789

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S181 of 2007

B e t w e e n -

SBVD

Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP

First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

GUMMOW J
KIEFEL J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON WEDNESDAY, 12 DECEMBER 2007, AT 9.43 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

GUMMOW J:   The applicant, a citizen of Bangladesh, seeks special leave to appeal against the orders of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (Collier J) exercising the appellate jurisdiction of that Court.  By those orders, Collier J dismissed the applicant's appeal against orders of the Federal Magistrates Court (Raphael FM) dismissing an application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal.  The applicant had sought to review the Tribunal's findings of fact.  Raphael FM found no jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's determination.  The Tribunal affirmed the decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse to grant the applicant a protection visa.  The applicant claimed that he feared persecution because of political opinion and he had a long-standing involvement in the Awami League.

Because the applicant is unrepresented, the application falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.

The applicant's written submissions do not advance any question of law that would justify a grant of special leave to appeal.  We see no reason to doubt the correctness of the conclusions reached in the courts below.  Special leave is refused.

Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. I publish the disposition signed by Kiefel J and myself.

AT 9.44 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Immigration

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Jurisdiction

  • Natural Justice

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Standing

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0