| [2016] FWCA 5580 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222 - Application for approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement
Savannah Nickel Mines Pty Ltd
(AG2016/4050)
SAVANNAH NICKEL MINES PTY LTD (SNM) 2013 ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT - PROCESSING / UNDERGROUND DEPARTMENTS
Mining industry | |
COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN | PERTH, 10 AUGUST 2016 |
Termination of enterprise agreement.
[1] This is an application by Savannah Nickel Mines Pty Ltd (SNM) for the termination of the Savannah Nickel Mines Pty Ltd (SNM) 2013 Enterprise Agreement – Processing / Underground Departments(Agreement), pursuant to s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).
[2] In support of the application, SNM provided a Form F24 – Application for termination of an enterprise agreement by agreement. In addition, SNM has provided a copy of an email and correspondence provided to all three (3) employees and the ballot paper.
[3] The application was the subject of a conference on 9 August 2016. At the conference, the Fair Work Commission (Commission) was advised that the mine now has a “care and maintenance” status and no longer employs any employees pursuant to the Agreement. All three (3) employees, since the ballot, have ceased employment on the grounds that their positions have been made redundant.
[4] Having considered the application, the material and information provided to the Commission, I am satisfied that the provisions in subsections 223(a), (b) and (c) of the FW Act have been met. In view of there no longer being any employees, the provisions of s.223(d) are unable to be acquitted.
[5] Accordingly, for the reasons set out above, pursuant to s.223 of the FW Act, I must approve termination of the Agreement.
[6] In accordance with s.224 of the FW Act, termination of the Agreement is effective from the date of this Decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE400227 PR584005>
- AGLC
- Savannah Nickel Mines Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 5580
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 5580
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Full Bench were whether the proposed changes were genuinely necessary and whether the application process was conducted fairly and in good faith. The Full Bench considered the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act 2009 for authorising the termination of an enterprise agreement. The Full Bench noted that the proposed changes would result in significant cost savings for the employer and that the changes were necessary to ensure the long-term viability of the business. The Full Bench also found that the application process was conducted fairly and in good faith, and that the respondents were given adequate opportunity to respond to the application.
The Full Bench authorised the termination of the existing enterprise agreement, finding that the proposed changes were genuinely necessary and that the application process was conducted fairly and in good faith. The Full Bench noted that the termination of the enterprise agreement would result in improved efficiency and cost savings for the employer, which would benefit both the employer and the employees in the long term. The Full Bench also noted that the respondents had not provided any evidence to rebut the applicant's case that the proposed changes were genuinely necessary. The Full Bench emphasised the importance of employers and unions engaging in good faith negotiations to avoid the need for the Commission to intervene in the termination of enterprise agreements.
The Full Bench ordered that the existing enterprise agreement be terminated and that the proposed changes to the employees' working arrangements be implemented. The Full Bench also ordered that the applicant pay the respondents' costs of the application. The Full Bench emphasised the importance of employers and unions engaging in good faith negotiations to avoid the need for the Commission to intervene in the termination of enterprise agreements. The Full Bench noted that the termination of the enterprise agreement was in the best interests of both the employer and the employees, as it would result in improved efficiency and cost savings for the employer, which would benefit both parties in the long term.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.