Saunders v Jackson
Case
•
[2009] NSWCA 192
•10 July 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Saunders v Jackson [2009] NSWCA 192
[2009] NSWCA 192
10 July 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal in *Saunders v Jackson* concerned the application of section 52 of the *Limitation Act 1969* (NSW), which provides for the suspension of limitation periods in cases of disability. The appellant, Mr. Jackson, sought to argue that the respondent, Ms. Saunders, was under a disability by reason of a depressive illness, which substantially impaired her ability to manage her affairs in relation to the cause of action. The primary judge had found that Ms. Saunders was indeed under such a disability.
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether Ms. Saunders' depressive illness constituted a disability within the meaning of section 52 of the *Limitation Act 1969* (NSW), thereby suspending the limitation period for her claim. This required the court to consider the nature of the impairment and whether it was sufficiently substantial to prevent her from managing her affairs concerning the cause of action.
The Court of Appeal, comprising Ipp JA, Macfarlan JA, and Hoeben J, affirmed the primary judge's finding. Their Honours reasoned that Ms. Saunders' depressive illness had substantially impaired her capacity to reason normally about the various aspects involved in bringing a claim. This impairment meant she was unable to manage her affairs in relation to the cause of action, thus satisfying the criteria for a disability under section 52.
Leave to appeal was granted, but the appeal was ultimately dismissed with costs.
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether Ms. Saunders' depressive illness constituted a disability within the meaning of section 52 of the *Limitation Act 1969* (NSW), thereby suspending the limitation period for her claim. This required the court to consider the nature of the impairment and whether it was sufficiently substantial to prevent her from managing her affairs concerning the cause of action.
The Court of Appeal, comprising Ipp JA, Macfarlan JA, and Hoeben J, affirmed the primary judge's finding. Their Honours reasoned that Ms. Saunders' depressive illness had substantially impaired her capacity to reason normally about the various aspects involved in bringing a claim. This impairment meant she was unable to manage her affairs in relation to the cause of action, thus satisfying the criteria for a disability under section 52.
Leave to appeal was granted, but the appeal was ultimately dismissed with costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Limitation Periods
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Saunders v Jackson [2009] NSWCA 192
Most Recent Citation
TB v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWSC 143
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Guthrie v Spence
[2009] NSWCA 369
Reznitsky v Rothonis
[2021] NSWSC 281
Davies v State of New South Wales
[2020] NSWSC 230
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
2
Olive v Johnstone
[2006] NSWCA 21
State of New South Wales v Harlum
[2007] NSWCA 120