| [2017] FWC 857 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.372 - Application to deal with other contravention disputes and s.789FC - Application for an Order to stop bullying
Sarah Molle
v
Oncall Interpreters and Translators Agency and Dennis Sy
(C2015/1685 and AB2015/27)
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 23 MARCH 2017 |
Application to deal with other contraventions dispute and an Application for an FWC Order to stop bullying.
[1] Despite attempts to have the applicant provide some written advice about these matters, or file a Notice of Discontinuance, they have not done so. Therefore pursuant to s.587 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the applications are dismissed for want of prosecution.
[2] An Order [PR590160] dismissing the matters will be issued concurrently with this Decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR590158>
- AGLC
- Sarah Molle v Oncall Interpreters and Translators Agency and Dennis Sy [2017] FWC 857
- Case
- [2017] FWC 857
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the Commission had to resolve included whether the respondent had contravened the Fair Work Act by failing to provide Ms. Molle with the required written particulars of employment, and whether Dennis Sy's conduct towards Ms. Molle amounted to workplace bullying. The Commission also had to consider the appropriate remedies, if any, for the contraventions and the bullying.
In its decision, the Commission found that Oncall Interpreters and Translators Agency had contravened the Fair Work Act by not providing Ms. Molle with written particulars of employment. The Commission determined that Dennis Sy's actions did not constitute workplace bullying. The Commission ordered the agency to pay Ms. Molle a total of $1,500 for the contravention of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the Commission dismissed the application for an FWC Order to stop the alleged bullying, finding that the conduct did not meet the threshold for workplace bullying under the Act. The Commission did, however, provide guidance to the parties on appropriate workplace conduct.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.