SANGARE v Department of Infrastructure
Case
•
[2015] FCCA 1795
•14 May 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Sangare v Department of Infrastructure [2015] FCCA 1795
[2015] FCCA 1795
14 May 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Sangare (the applicant) brought proceedings against the Department of Infrastructure (the respondent) alleging contravention of a general protection under the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by reason of adverse action taken against him due to his race. The respondent sought summary dismissal of the proceedings.
The primary legal issue before Judge Jarrett was whether the proceedings were prohibited because a complaint made by the applicant to the Australian Human Rights Commission was extant, and whether that complaint was made in contravention of the prohibition in section 725 of the *Fair Work Act 2009*.
Judge Jarrett reasoned that section 725 of the *Fair Work Act 2009* prohibits a person from making a complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission about a matter that is also the subject of proceedings in a court or tribunal. However, the court found that the complaint made by the applicant to the Australian Human Rights Commission was not made in contravention of this prohibition, as it was made prior to the commencement of the court proceedings. Therefore, the respondent's application for summary dismissal was refused.
The primary legal issue before Judge Jarrett was whether the proceedings were prohibited because a complaint made by the applicant to the Australian Human Rights Commission was extant, and whether that complaint was made in contravention of the prohibition in section 725 of the *Fair Work Act 2009*.
Judge Jarrett reasoned that section 725 of the *Fair Work Act 2009* prohibits a person from making a complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission about a matter that is also the subject of proceedings in a court or tribunal. However, the court found that the complaint made by the applicant to the Australian Human Rights Commission was not made in contravention of this prohibition, as it was made prior to the commencement of the court proceedings. Therefore, the respondent's application for summary dismissal was refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Employment Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Summary Judgment
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Abuse of Process
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0