Sandra Bucknell v GJ Gardner Homes

Case [2023] FWC 3180


[2023] FWC 3180

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Sandra Bucknell
v

GJ Gardner Homes

(U2023/9757)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 1 DECEMBER 2023

Application for relief from unfair dismissal – minimum employment period – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative.

  1. On 7 October 2023 Sandra Bucknell (Applicant) made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. Mrs Bucknell advised in the Form F2 Unfair Dismissal Application (Form F2) that she commenced employment with GJ Gardner Homes (Respondent) on Monday 8 May 2023 and that her dismissal took effect on 19 September 2023.

  1. On 11 October 2023 the Commission attempted to contact Mrs Bucknell on her nominated telephone number. A voicemail was left advising Mrs Bucknell that she had not served the minimum employment period.

  1. Later that day the Commission emailed correspondence to Mrs Bucknell’s nominated email address advising her that, on the basis of the information provided in the Form F2, she had not served the minimum employment period. The correspondence directed Mrs Bucknell to file any documents or other evidence to support her claim that she had served the required minimum employment period. That correspondence also warned that if she did not contact the Commission within 14 days the application may be dismissed without further notice.

  1. On 8 November 2023, as the required documentation was not received, the Commission attempted to contact Mrs Bucknell on her nominated telephone number. However, Mrs Bucknell could not be reached. A voicemail message was left requesting that she urgently contact the Commission as the application may be dismissed if the minimum employment period has not been met.

  1. On 16 November 2023 a final follow up call was made to Mrs Bucknell. However, she could not be reached.  A voicemail message was left requesting that Mrs Bucknell urgently contact the Commission as her application was at risk of dismissal. To date Mrs Bucknell has not replied to the Commission’s correspondence.

  1. Section 382 of the FW Act provides that a person is protected from unfair dismissal if they have completed a period of employment. Section 383 of the FW Act sets out the minimum employment period as follows:

383 Meaning of minimum employment period

The minimum employment period is:

(a) if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the earlier of the following times:

(i) the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;

(ii) immediately before the dismissal; or

(b) if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. As the material before the Commission indicates the Applicant has not completed the required minimum employment period under the FW Act, I am satisfied the application has no reasonable prospect of success. As such, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(c) of the FW Act. An Order[1] to this effect will be issued with this decision.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] PR768897

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR768894>

Details
AGLC
Sandra Bucknell v GJ Gardner Homes [2023] FWC 3180
Case
[2023] FWC 3180
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Sandra Bucknell lodged an application for unfair dismissal against GJ Gardner Homes before the Fair Work Commission, seeking a remedy under section 394 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Bucknell alleged she was dismissed on 19 September 2023, having commenced employment with GJ Gardner Homes on 8 May 2023. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the application was valid, particularly in light of the statutory requirement that an employee must complete a minimum employment period before being eligible for protection from unfair dismissal under the Act.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether Bucknell had fulfilled the minimum employment period stipulated by section 383 of the Fair Work Act. Given that GJ Gardner Homes is not a small business employer, the minimum employment period required is six months. The Commission needed to verify whether Bucknell had completed this period by the time of her alleged dismissal or by the time she was notified of the dismissal. If Bucknell had not served the requisite six months, the application would not meet the statutory criteria for protection against unfair dismissal.

In considering the matter, Deputy President Clancy found that the evidence provided by Bucknell did not demonstrate that she had completed the minimum six-month employment period. The Commission had contacted Bucknell multiple times, warning her that her application might be dismissed if she failed to provide evidence supporting her claim of having met the employment period requirement. Despite these warnings and follow-up attempts, Bucknell did not provide the necessary documentation or respond to the Commission’s communications. Consequently, the Deputy President concluded that the application had no reasonable prospect of success, as it did not meet the statutory prerequisites. The application was dismissed under section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act.

The Fair Work Commission issued an order dismissing Sandra Bucknell's application for unfair dismissal on the basis that she had not completed the minimum employment period required by the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.