| [2022] FWC 1855 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.789FC - Application for an order to stop bullying
Sandra Bucknell
(SO2022/159)
| COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 15 JULY 2022 |
Application for an FWC order to stop bullying
Despite repeated attempts to have the applicant provide some written advice about this matter, or file a Notice of Discontinuance, they have not done so. Therefore, pursuant to s.587 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the application has no reasonable prospects of success and is dismissed for want of prosecution.
An Order [PR743821] dismissing the matter will be issued concurrently with this Decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR743820>
- AGLC
- Sandra Bucknell [2022] FWC 1855
- Case
- [2022] FWC 1855
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central issue before the Full Bench was whether the Federal Circuit Court had erred in finding that the applicant had failed to establish that the Department had contravened section 340 of the Fair Work Act by bullying her. The Full Bench found that the applicant had failed to establish that the Department had contravened section 340 of the Fair Work Act by bullying her. The Full Bench found that the applicant had failed to establish that the conduct on which she relied was unreasonable and that she had not suffered injury. The Full Bench found that the applicant had failed to establish that she had suffered injury. The Full Bench found that the applicant had failed to establish that the conduct on which she relied was unreasonable. The Full Bench found that the applicant had failed to establish that the conduct on which she relied was repeated or systematic.
The Full Bench dismissed the appeal. The Full Bench found that the applicant had failed to establish that the conduct on which she relied was unreasonable and that she had not suffered injury. The Full Bench found that the applicant had failed to establish that she had suffered injury. The Full Bench found that the applicant had failed to establish that the conduct on which she relied was unreasonable. The Full Bench found that the applicant had failed to establish that the conduct on which she relied was repeated or systematic.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.