San v The Queen

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

SAN
v

THE QUEEN
[2020] HCASL 220
A15/2020

  1. The applicant requires an extension of time within which to file an application for special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of South Australia. The appeal foreshadowed in the application lacks sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. Hence, it would be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought. Special leave to appeal should be refused.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

S.J. Gageler P.A. Keane
14 October 2020
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read San v The Queen and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] HCASL 220
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of San v The Queen involved the applicant seeking an extension of time within which to file an application for special leave to appeal against a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of South Australia. The applicant, San, wished to appeal against his conviction and sentence. The application was considered by the High Court of Australia, where the primary issue was whether the application for an extension of time should be granted. A secondary issue was whether the appeal itself had sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal.

The High Court examined the merits of the application for an extension of time and the potential appeal. The Court found that the appeal lacked sufficient prospects of success, rendering it futile to grant the extension of time that was sought. The Court also noted that the applicant had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances warranting an extension of time. Therefore, the Court concluded that special leave to appeal should be refused.

In light of the Court's decision, it was directed that the Registrar draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application for an extension of time. The Court further noted that the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed due to the lack of prospects of success. The final orders were made pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth).

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.