| [2014] FWCA 5986 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Samuel Smith & Son Pty Ltd
(AG2014/7059)
SAMUEL SMITH & SON PTY LTD AUSTRALIA EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT (WAREHOUSE EMPLOYEES) 2014
Wine industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BARTEL | ADELAIDE, 29 AUGUST 2014 |
Application for approval of the Samuel Smith & Son Pty Ltd Australia Employee Collective Agreement (Warehouse Employees) 2014
[1] An application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Samuel Smith & Son Pty Ltd Australia Employee Collective Agreement (Warehouse Employees) 2014 (the Agreement) has been made by Samuel Smith & Son Pty Ltd (the employer). The application has been made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and is an application for a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The consultation term in the Agreementfails to reflect the recent amendments to s.205 of the Act 1 relating to changes to regular rosters and ordinary hours of work. In accordance with s.205(2) of the Act the model consultation term will be taken to be a term of the Agreement. It has been appended to the Agreement as Schedule 1.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) of the Act the Agreement will operate from 5 September 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
1 Sections 205(1)(a) and (1A) of the Act
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE409850 PR554868>
- AGLC
- Samuel Smith & Son Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 5986
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 5986
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission was required to determine whether the proposed agreement met the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to the "better off overall test" (BOOT). This test ensures that employees are not worse off financially under the proposed agreement compared to their previous conditions. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement complied with the principles of good faith bargaining and whether it was made in a manner that was procedurally fair.
In delivering its decision, the Commission examined the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that the proposed agreement satisfied the BOOT, as it provided employees with improved wages and conditions while maintaining productivity and efficiency in the workplace. The Commission also noted that the agreement was the result of genuine and good faith bargaining between the parties. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, finding it to be in compliance with the relevant legislative framework.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Samuel Smith & Son Pty Ltd Australia Employee Collective Agreement (Warehouse Employees) 2014, effective from the date of the decision. This outcome reflects the Commission's commitment to facilitating fair and productive workplace agreements that benefit both employers and employees. The approval of this agreement is expected to contribute to a harmonious and efficient working environment within the company.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.