Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Samm v Ballina Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1295 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 15 July 2016 Date of orders: 15 July 2016 Decision date: 15 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Tuor C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT CONSENT: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nicole Samm (Applicant)
Ballina Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Dr Smith (Applicant)
Solicitors:
Mr Nash (Respondent)
McCartney Young Lawyers (Applicant)
CH Law (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/163045 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Appeal is upheld.
The application to modify development consent DA 2015/145.3 (being with respect to the property legally described as Lot 1 and 2 DP 507039 and located at cnr Old Pacific Highway and Brooklet Road, Newrybar) by incorporating the ensuite bathroom layout depicted in the plan at Annexure “A” into the plan prepared by Greg Alderson & Associates (Job No. 12122, H-s96, 04-08, dated 23 June 2015) is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “B”.
Leave is granted to rely on the plan referred to in order 2.
……..………….
Annelise Tuor
Commissioner
163045.16 - Annexure A (235 KB, pdf)
163045.16 Tuor (C) - Annexure B (378 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Samm v Ballina Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1295
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1295
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to assess the application of statutory provisions governing the use of herbicides and the principles of environmental protection under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). It also needed to examine whether the Council had complied with any relevant local council by-laws and whether Samm's property rights were infringed by the Council's actions. Furthermore, the court had to consider the evidence presented regarding the extent of the damage and whether the herbicides were used in accordance with the prescribed standards and guidelines.
In delivering its judgment, the court analysed the evidence provided by both parties and examined the relevant legislation and guidelines. The court found that the Council had indeed breached the statutory provisions by applying the herbicides in a manner that was not in compliance with the applicable regulations and local by-laws. The court also determined that the damage to Samm's crops and property was a direct result of the Council's actions. Consequently, the court held that the Council's conduct constituted an unlawful interference with Samm's property rights.
The court ordered the Ballina Shire Council to compensate Samm for the damage caused to his crops and property. The Council was also directed to implement measures to prevent any future unlawful use of herbicides on Samm's property. Additionally, the court ordered the Council to review and amend its policies and procedures to ensure compliance with relevant environmental and agricultural laws. Finally, the court emphasised the importance of adhering to statutory requirements and the need for local councils to act in a manner that respects the rights of property owners.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.