Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2003] AATA 231
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No Q2001/1161
VETERANS' APPEALS DIVISION ) Re JANETTE HELEN SALTER Applicant
And
REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Deputy President Don Muller Date12 March 2003
PlaceBrisbane
Decision The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and in substitution determines that the death of the late veteran, John Salter, on 31 October 1996, was war-caused within the meaning of that term in the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. ..............(Signed)................................
D.W. MULLER
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
6. There is no dispute about the following facts and the Tribunal finds that:
(a)John Salter was born in the United Kingdom on 6 January 1924.
(b)He served in the British Army from 6 January 1942 until 21 May 1952.
(c)He served in the Australian Army from 20 October 1952 until 31 May 1974.
(d)He had operational service in Vietnam from 3 February 1967 until 1 July 1967.
(e)He had never lived in a tropical area until he went to Vietnam.
(f)He had eligible defence service from 7 December 1972 until 31 May 1974.
(g)He suffered from hypertension before he joined the Australian Army in 1952.
(h)The available medical records show that his blood pressure readings were recorded in the following years:
1952 140/85 1972 130/95
June 1964 145/85 1973 130/90
1965 145/80 1974 150/90
1966 160/85 13 Feb 1996 255/90
1969 160/80 16 Feb 1996 210/90
1970 160/80
(i)The clinical onset of his heart disease was in 1996.
(j)He died on 31 October 1996, aged 72 years. The cause of death was recorded in his death certificate as:
“Myocardial infarction, and Severe atherosclerosis of coronary arteries”
7. The Applicant gave evidence to the following effect:
(a)She first met her husband in 1979. He told her that he had recently ceased smoking.
(b)The veteran ate at least a dessert spoon of salt on all of his meals including breakfast, every day.
(c)The veteran would sometimes pour salt on to his hand and eat it after mowing the lawn;
(d)The veteran told his wife that he required a lot of salt “since being in the tropics” and that the doctors in Vietnam told him that he should have salt in the tropics;
(e)Even though she had heated discussions with her husband about his excessive salt consumption he never reduced his salt intake even when he was later diagnosed with hypertension and ischaemic heart disease.
8. The veterans’ colleague and friend, Roger Mattiske, gave the following evidence:
(a)He had known the veteran since January 1957;
(b)During their service in Vietnam they were both ordered to take four salt tablets daily in order to help preserve body fluids;
(c)He witnessed the veteran while in service and later at his home, pour salt on to his hand and eat it;
(d)He noticed during the mess meals he shared with the veteran, after their service in Vietnam, that the veteran’s first move was towards the salt shaker;
(e)His own experience was that he had also developed a…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Salter and Repatriation Commission and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2003] AATA 231
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the veteran's death was war-caused as defined by the Act. This required consideration of whether the veteran's hypertension and ischaemic heart disease were connected to his war service and if the Statement of Principles pertaining to these conditions was satisfied. Additionally, the Tribunal had to determine whether the veteran had consumed 12g of salt prior to the clinical worsening of his hypertension, as this was a condition precedent to the widow's entitlement to a pension.
In reaching its decision, the Tribunal examined the evidence provided by the parties and considered the medical records and expert opinions. It found that the veteran's hypertension and ischaemic heart disease were connected to his war service and that the Statement of Principles was satisfied. The Tribunal also concluded that the condition regarding salt consumption was met. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the decision under review and determined that the veteran's death was war-caused, entitling the widow to a pension.
The Tribunal's final order was to set aside the original decision and substitute a determination that the veteran's death was war-caused, thereby granting the widow the war widow pension she sought.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and in substitution determines that the death of the late veteran, John Salter, on 31 October 1996, was war-caused within the meaning of that term in the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.