Saje v Union for Progressive Judaism Inc. and Ors (No.3)
[2020] FCCA 340
•19 February 2020
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| SAJE v UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM INC. & ORS (No.3) | [2020] FCCA 340 |
| Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Interlocutory application – applicant seeking order that no further documents be accepted for filing – applicant seeking order to strike out documents of the respondent – application in a case dismissed. |
| Applicant: | LEENA SAJE |
| First Respondent: | UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM INC. |
| Second Respondent: | JOEL MENDELSON |
| Third Respondent: | STEPHEN FREEMAN |
| Fourth Respondent: | JOCELYN ROBUCK |
| Fifth Respondent: | STEVE DANENBERG |
| Sixth Respondent: | ROGER MENDELSON |
| File Number: | PEG 715 of 2017 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 19 February 2020 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 19 February 2020 |
| Delivered at: | PERTH |
| Delivered on: | 19 February 2020 |
REPRESENTATION
The Applicant appeared in person.
| Counsel for the Respondents: | Ms P Giles |
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | MinterEllison |
ORDERS
The application in a case filed on 10 February 2020 is dismissed.
DATE OF ORDER: 19 February 2020
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PERTH |
PEG 715 of 2017
| LEENA SAJE |
Applicant
And
| UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM INC |
First Respondent
| JOEL MENDELSON |
Second Respondent
| STEPHEN FREEMAN |
Third Respondent
| JOCELYN ROBUCK |
Fourth Respondent
| STEVE DANENBERG |
Fifth Respondent
| ROGER MENDELSON |
Sixth Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The application in a case filed on 10 February 2020 is dismissed.
That application seeks orders that are not appropriate at this stage when the matter has been fixed for final hearing today.
Accordingly it is not appropriate to entertain the strike out application or the order for no further filing of documents.
I certify that the preceding three (3) paragraphs are a true copy of the transcript of the published oral reasons for judgement of Judge Street delivered in open Court on 19 February 2020 and the parties were provided sealed copies of the Court’s orders.
Associate:
Date: 29 April 2020
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Abuse of Process
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Stay of Proceedings
0
0