Saje v Union for Progressive Judaism Inc. and Ors (No.3)

Case

[2020] FCCA 340

19 February 2020


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SAJE v UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM INC. & ORS (No.3) [2020] FCCA 340
Catchwords:
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Interlocutory application – applicant seeking order that no further documents be accepted for filing – applicant seeking order to strike out documents of the respondent – application in a case dismissed.  
Applicant: LEENA SAJE
First Respondent: UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM INC.
Second Respondent: JOEL MENDELSON
Third Respondent: STEPHEN FREEMAN
Fourth Respondent: JOCELYN ROBUCK
Fifth Respondent: STEVE DANENBERG
Sixth Respondent: ROGER MENDELSON
File Number: PEG 715 of 2017
Judgment of: Judge Street
Hearing date: 19 February 2020
Date of Last Submission: 19 February 2020
Delivered at: PERTH
Delivered on: 19 February 2020

REPRESENTATION

The Applicant appeared in person.

Counsel for the Respondents: Ms P Giles
Solicitors for the Respondents: MinterEllison

ORDERS

  1. The application in a case filed on 10 February 2020 is dismissed.

DATE OF ORDER: 19 February 2020

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT PERTH

PEG 715 of 2017

LEENA SAJE

Applicant

And

UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM INC

First Respondent

JOEL MENDELSON

Second Respondent

STEPHEN FREEMAN

Third Respondent

JOCELYN ROBUCK

Fourth Respondent

STEVE DANENBERG

Fifth Respondent

ROGER MENDELSON

Sixth Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. The application in a case filed on 10 February 2020 is dismissed.

  2. That application seeks orders that are not appropriate at this stage when the matter has been fixed for final hearing today.

  3. Accordingly it is not appropriate to entertain the strike out application or the order for no further filing of documents. 

I certify that the preceding three (3) paragraphs are a true copy of the transcript of the published oral reasons for judgement of Judge Street delivered in open Court on 19 February 2020 and the parties were provided sealed copies of the Court’s orders.

Associate: 

Date: 29 April 2020

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Abuse of Process

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Stay of Proceedings

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

1

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0